• MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    great thing about jewish is you get to be an abused minority with no one actually giving you credit for being an abused minority.

  • Allemaniac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    a private membership association (PMA) for individuals and families with traditional views and European ancestry

    tf why are we europeans catching strays again

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Fucking insane. I wish I could say “Of course it’s Arkansas”, but I’d suspect this of almost any rural area anymore.

    • The_Sasswagon@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sarcasctically, because one is in real life and the other in a computer, and you aren’t being excluded or hurt from anything tangible. But I suspect you mean what if there were a town in real life that excluded men.

      I think the inherent threat of violence would be a pretty clear difference between the the real and imagined scenario. I’ve been near a house with white power banners all over it in the south, I’m white and a man, and I felt threatened. I imagine the people those bigots hated would feel so much worse, more than I can realistically imagine. The threat of violence is inherent with racism everywhere, but in the rural US south, that racism carries more intent to do harm.

      I do not imagine a town of women excluding men and by doing so imply they would hurt me or kill me if I came near or wandered into their town on accident. And I am a white man as I said before. Now if they also excluded trans women that would be a more clear indicator of bigotry and intent to harm.

      And going back to the community you first mentioned, it doesn’t allow men for the opposite reason, as I interpret it. It is to protect the women in the community from men who are much more likely to be a harm to the people inside. Because men are used to being allowed to go anywhere and everywhere, being gently told, “hey this discussion isn’t for you, but you’re welcome to sit and listen if you’re quiet” is interpreted as an explicit act of violence, even though it’s clearly not.

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        yeah the post was taken down, apparently

        i’m playing devil’s advocate and asking what is the difference between a community that is women-only and one that is white-only. aren’t both discrimination? and if people can just declare a community for themselves, can’t they both do so?

        i.e., where is the “law is blind” principle in this?

        Edit: JUST TO BE CLEAR, i’m not advocating for white-only communities or anything like it. i’d merely like to understand what arguments one might bring up to counter it?

        • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I think both women only communities and whites only communities are okay, so long as they’re not bothering anyone else what’s the stress? I wouldn’t go to a women only community because I’m not one and I wouldn’t go to a whites only community because it sounds fucking horrible. But if they’re not harming anyone I don’t see the problem

          Edit Ah yeah sorry you were doing the devil’s advocate thing anyway. I should go to bed! G’night

      • jsomae@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        wdym? white supremacists virtue-signal about it. And regardless, I don’t think that whether or not one virtue signals should affect policy.

          • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            yeah but i feel like that’s not the reason

            if a group of women demanded a private space for themselves in a public area, i guess people would be ok with that. why so? why wouldn’t the same be accepted if it was instead a group of white people asking that no person of color intrude? isn’t both discrimination?

            or have we merely adopted a habit of granting women special rights, as a habit of culture? if so, it should be explicitely mentioned somewhere, otherwise our speech doesn’t reflect our thoughts.

            • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              29 days ago

              The more used to privilege you become, the more that equality looks like discrimination.

              Get over yourself.

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      DM me the banger of the comment and I will comment it for you (assuming it doesn’t break the other rules on the sub.) Pretty sure this doesn’t break rule 1, since women are allowed to quote men. I’ll add a > and ping you to make it clear it’s a quote.

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        oh the post wasn’t about my comment on /c/WomensStuff, it was merely a broader discussion about what kind of exclusion is possible/ethical/appropriate on a public forum.

  • SuzyQ@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Seeing the title, “it’s in Harrison, isn’t it?” Reading the article, “it doesn’t say where.” Feeling dirty and clicking on the link to their site, “It says Ozarks… And North East Arkansas. Not quite Harrison.”

    Harrison is well known for being incredibly racist and the K³ capital of Arkansas.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Oh. Oh this is a good thing. This actually a great thing!

    Like, you’re going to have a lot of white supremacists pooled together in an easy to find spot.

    I’ll let you fill in the rest with your imagination. :)

    • TassieTosser@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, I thought we’d have to spend resources to put them in camps but they’re putting themselves into camps that can be easily cut off.

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It makes for a Star Trek TNG episode? The one where everyone looks the same because they’re clones?

  • Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Good, put all these assholes in these places. Leave the rest of the country to those of us who think both POC, immigrants, and LGBTQ+ are an asset, not a detriment.

  • CleoCommunist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I had already seen the article and a video about It. Good let them stay there, then you trap them in their community with no way out. No outside world, no outside food, no outside other tyan their stupid community. See how they like it

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Trump administration:

    “We hear there’s a Wonderful Community starting up in Arkansas, really great stuff, it should be a model for the rest of the country! We’re denying all federal aid to any state that refuses to follow the lead of this Wonderful Community!”

  • Nay@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    These never stopped being a thing. They’re called “Sundown” Towns; if you ain’t welcome you’d better be gone by sundown.