Right above this post:
“My Couples Retreat With 3 AI Chatbots and the Humans Who Love Them“ top article on wired
Both groups were asked to research how to start a vegetable garden, with some participants randomly selected to use AI, while others were asked to use a search engine. According to the study’s findings, those who used ChatGPT gave much worse advice about how to plant a vegetable garden than those who used the search engine.
This seems like not quite the same thing as the implied effective brain damage from the headline.
Similar studies suggest the same, essentially the potential for cognitive decline by using ai to think for you. The headline implied nothing, you inferred. The word “suggests” does a lot of heavy lifiting.
I welcome you all to my level. 🙂↕️
And the people who control the Ai control us.
I use it to help me correct my grammar and punctuation. It’s great at fixing those problems. Other than that, it’s just been a fever dream
As opposed to learning how grammar and punctuation work yourself, and being more knowledgeable.
I dunno, been loving my glue pizza
Eh. People do just fine at that without AI, what difference does it really make?
Probably double the number of those people. Or worse.
That’s why I limit my use of it to moronic activities, like replying to brain-dead customers who can’t read five lines of text. If I didn’t, I wouldn’t be able to restrain myself from insulting them, probably.
