• Jiggle_Physics@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      This isn’t the question being asked here. They are arguing whether or not her walking up to people yelling bigoted slurs at her, before she was pushed to the ground, which caused her to pull a gun on them, was an action of incitement, because the other people stayed across the street from her, and did not approach. Whichever way you think this case should favor, or if it is bullshit or not, it is not about whether or not trans people count as people under the law according to the stand your ground laws. It is asking whether bigoted slurs alone count as violent incitement, because approaching someone aggressively already can.

      • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I was going off the headline.

        But if she was pushed to the ground, as you say, that’s more than enough cause to stand one’s ground.

        Like, literally.

        • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          I was going off the headline.

          Why contribute to something that you didn’t take the time to read about?

        • CodingCarpenter@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          She went across the street to confront a group of assholes. That sounds like a Darwin Award right there. Then got pushed down and then the group tried to leave again but she pulled the gun.

          This is all on her. Though I’m unsure about felony charges if the gun is registered. They don’t mention if it is.

          • SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            She went across the street to confront a group of assholes. That sounds like a Darwin Award right there.

            Your comment implies that you think she deserved to die for standing up against bigotry.

            • CodingCarpenter@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              No not what I want to imply. But there is a certain amount of self preservation at work here. You don’t challenge a group of actively aggressive people head on. Had she not felt brave thanks to the gun I suspect she would have stayed where she was. Mad and rightly so, but fine

              • SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                Personally, I think she may have done a good thing. She is not the only victim. If other would-be bigots learn not to spout hateful bullshit, she has helped more people than herself.

                Admittedly, I was not there. It’s possible she was looking for an excuse, but that’s not the impression I get from the story.

                  • SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    No, that’s not remotely what anyone said. I think it’s acceptable for a person to defend themselves.

                    She was understandably afraid after being pushed to the ground. Nobody got shot.

                    Kelver, while still on her back, allegedly pulled out a .380-caliber semiautomatic handgun, racked it, and pointed it at Durham. She put the gun away after Durham and his group walked away, then returned to her job at the Crowbar & Grille, according to the prosecution.

              • magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                You know what? I don’t care. No one should.

                You should, legally and morally, be able to give the what for to a group of bigots without physical recourse. I don’t care if its stupid for physical safety reasons or not.

                Just because you did it with a concealed weapon doesn’t mean you should immediately loose your right to defend yourself.

                Literally the argument is about her starting the altercation, but these dudes both fucked with her first, then put their hands on her first.

                If she was the right type-a person, and those men weren’t, my $10 says this would probably be an open and shut case.

                Say what you will about .ml users, but at least most of you understand the paradox of tolerance, and that hate speech is inherently a threat of violence.

              • SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                No, that’s not remotely what anyone said. I think it’s acceptable for a person to defend themselves.

                She was understandably afraid after being pushed to the ground. Nobody got shot.

                Kelver, while still on her back, allegedly pulled out a .380-caliber semiautomatic handgun, racked it, and pointed it at Durham. She put the gun away after Durham and his group walked away, then returned to her job at the Crowbar & Grille, according to the prosecution.