Equipment used:

  • Lumix G85
  • Lumix 100-300 f4-f5.6
  • SA-GTI

Image:

  • 10 sec, f/6.3, 6400 ISO
  • 1200 Lights
  • 50 Biases, Darks, Flats

Stacked using Siril and edited in GIMP

As you can see, there is a lot of noise, even with heavy editing and noise reduction in siril as well as in GIMP, and I’m out of ideas of what could cause it. I tried different exposures (from 10s to 30s), different ISOs (1600-6400). I tried to manually dither by moving the mount through the App every 30 minutes or so. I also used a lens dew heater at different temperatures ranging from 15°C to -5°C with no difference in noise.

I got a successful result a few months ago with the Orion nebula, the only differences were the exposure of 5 seconds and a Omegon Mount MiniTrack LX3 Essentials mount which couldn’t be polar aligned very well. I can’t imagine that the difference from 5 to 10 seconds exposure did all the difference.

Can anyone help me?

  • vastunknown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Late to the party but wanted to help:

    What you are seeing is a fixed pattern noise that is actually being reinforced by your many, short subs. This is called “walking noise”, especially common with cameras of this class when used for AP due to their sensor noise characteristics.

    You must dither more frequently. For non-dedicated astronomers camera, you will also want to dither a fairly large amount. Dithering every 30 minutes is effectively not dithering at all.

    Things you should aim for to help fix your image:

    • Dither often (every 5-10 frames is a good target) and large (~20-30px, anything larger and you’re cropping a lot)
    • Inspect calibration frames for fixed pattern noise (up bias to 200 frames, ensure flats do not capture artifacts from your light source like LEDs by increasing exposure time to ~2s)
    • Use dark-flat calibration frames to improve your flats and reduce the chance that’s what’s contributing
    • If you are using the same calibration frames from your success on Orion a few months ago, there’s a chance they are poorly matched now due to differences in ambient temperature, camera settings, etc which could explain poor calibration performance which could result in walking noise like this
    • Depending on other factors, like the moon/light pollution/etc, you could be stretching this image harder than you did for Orion, which could also result in the walking noise being more pronounced in the final image
    • Ensure long exposure NR setting in your camera is off, in body stabilization is off, mechanical shutter is on…sanity checks for your camera specifically
    • ISO 6400 is high - learn about ISO invariance, your camera (source: https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonic-lumix-dmc-g85-g80/7) will yield the same resulting photo (from a noise perspective) when set much lower, without limiting your dynamic range…ISO 1600 is a good rule of thumb for DSLRs in my experience
    • Use winsorized sigma-clipping for stacking
    • As always, the name of the game is longer exposures! Aiming for 30s or more would benefit you a lot. When working with a DSRL and more/shorter subs, the quality of your calibrations frames becomes very important and dithering often is essential
  • Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    19 days ago

    Try longer exposures, your mount can do 30 sec easily with a 300mm lens, even without guiding.

    Also, go through your subs and remove anything that looks out of the ordinary. Better to have 600 good subs than 1200 with bad ones in the mix. Look for clouds and condensation mostly.

    This sort of noise increases the closer to the horizon the target gets. Stay above 30 degrees if possible.

    Check if your white balance is set to auto, if it is set it to something fixed.

    Lastly, judging by the end result you should try a less aggressive stretch, especially for the background. You can make a mask of the nebulous part, stretch it a lot and then use it as a luminance and saturation mask over a copy layer that has a neutralized, darker background.

    There’s lots of good signal in there, give it a go

    • Linsensuppe@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      I tried imaging with 30 seconds exposure recently on the Andromeda Galaxy and got this result with almost identical noise:

      This was 315 subs at 30 seconds so around 2.5 hours of exposure.

      So just increasing the exposure did not do a difference.

      • Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        Check each channel individually. Are the noise levels and shapes different for red, green and blue?

        • Linsensuppe@feddit.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          In the final .fit the Red channel has, as expected, the fewest signal, but also the most noise in the dark areas of the image.

          In the Raw subs I couldn’t make out a channel with more noise than another.

  • lefty7283@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    It could also be that you’re not dithering often enough. Dithering every 30 mins means you’re taking 180 frames before each dither and that’ll really let the walking/raining noise build up. you could try doing 30" subs and then dithering every ~10 minutes if that’s practical? For me personally I dither after a max of 5 subs (or dither after a sequence of something like LLLLRRGGBB) , but I know I’m also taking longer exposures and have the benefit of automation.

    Personally I’ve never used a GTi or Lumix camera, but if you’re able to hook them to a computer with NINA, there is an option to have it dither automatically even without an autoguider

    • Linsensuppe@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      AFAIK NINA doesn’t work with my camera, but since my mount is within Wi-Fi reach of me, I can move the GTI through the app slightly from inside. My question with that is, how much do I have to/should I dither? Currently, I move the stars so that there is a significant jump on the SLR screen, so I would guess it’s a few hundred pixels in x and y direction.

      • lefty7283@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        Few hundred pixels is definitely enough, and kinda overkill (mine goes a few dozen). I think the frequency of the dithers is probably the main thing that could help with the noise