• corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    It’s not confirmation bias if the bias is confirmed, is it?

    (For the non-canucks, the “progressive” part isn’t supported by facts, so ya know)

      • cheat700000007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        8 days ago

        They like extracting oil and natural resources, but also giving it away near free to other countries (read: usa). So kinda both?

        • President Camacho@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          He’s from New Brunswick, it’s a bit different here.

          We give all our forests to Irving, they wreck the environment, and we keep them in check by giving them huge tax breaks.

          It’s a win-win-win.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 days ago

        Every so often in Canada, conservatives get to be unpopular enough they need to merge with other parties so they can win. They merged with the Progressive Party a long time ago so that’s what they’re called Progressive Conservative in a lot of provinces. Except in Alberta where they had to do more mergers and they’re the United Conservative Party now.

        Federally, the Progressive Conservative Party later merged with the Reform party and I guess “reform” cancels out “progressive” so they’re just the Conservative Party at the Federal level now.