db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 days agoPSAlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square26linkfedilinkarrow-up190arrow-down160
arrow-up130arrow-down1imagePSAlemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 days agomessage-square26linkfedilink
minus-squarenaevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up21arrow-down1·7 days agoEh if I’m not gonna do what the gov tells me I’m not gonna listen to a random internet comment repeating dogma ;)
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down19·7 days agoit’s a fact, not dogma
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down2·7 days agoAccelerationism is a religion.
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down5·7 days agothis isn’t about accelerationism
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·6 days agoAnti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·edit-26 days agostating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·6 days ago Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism you’re making that up
minus-squarefubbernuckin@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down2·6 days agoI find this sentence very funny
Eh if I’m not gonna do what the gov tells me I’m not gonna listen to a random internet comment repeating dogma ;)
it’s a fact, not dogma
Accelerationism is a religion.
this isn’t about accelerationism
Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
stating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
you’re making that up
I find this sentence very funny