db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 8 days agoPSAlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square26linkfedilinkarrow-up190arrow-down160
arrow-up130arrow-down1imagePSAlemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 8 days agomessage-square26linkfedilink
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·7 days agoAnti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·edit-26 days agostating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·6 days ago Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism you’re making that up
Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
stating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
you’re making that up