• 0 Posts
  • 45 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2026

help-circle

  • And the reason this is even tolerated is only because most people don’t understand how LLMs work. Like politicians and their “kill switch” idea if an AI “goes rogure” for example. That there’s like one persistent Claude entity, living in a big room at Anthropic HQ remembering and learning things from all the users it interacts with… Of course it’s not that, it’s an instance of a program that launches and runs the same function every time on whatever inputs it is fed. Sometimes it is set up to feed back old inputs each time so it acts like it has some memory of what your instance previously did. Training a model is sort of like creating a hologram and prompting it is sort of like taking a photo of the hologram from a certain angle.

    They could of course train the next version of the model on everyone’s prompts to the previous version- and probably are. But that’s in no way necessary, and is already sort of a desparation move when they’re running out of input text.

    If the trade secrets / PII you’re foolishly sharing with it are getting leaked that’s not an accidental, inevitable consequence of how AI works. It’s because the company hosting the AI is greedily harvesting and storing all your inputs, for no other reason than you agreed it could in the TOS you didn’t read, and then later oopsie they failed to secure it because they don’t really care and know no one will hold them accountable. Yor prompt is the same as any other text you sent in an input form to any website, the company has it and can decide to only use it for what it has to- or for everything it can get away with.



  • They have to at least have a plausible path to profitability. The serious investors have known for some time there isn’t one with AI. Just because the AI companies will never be profitable long term doesn’t mean there is no reason to invest in them short term. That’s what a speculative bubble is. Everyone believes the line will keep going up long enough for them to turn around and sell to a greater fool in the near future. And for the most part they’re right. The ultimate bag-holder ends up being the middle class worker and their auto-assigned 401k portfolio.










  • As others already said the people actually making the software all this time had little to no autonomy over what they are making.

    At any big company even the head of an engineering department is subservient to the latest powerpoint brainfart decided upon in a weekly meeting of the marketing and sales teams, if it impresses the executives they’re going to say “can you make it do this” and the expected answer is “yes and it will take about this long to do”. And then go back to their desk and start figuring out how to make it work.

    It works this way because we’re a steeply wealth-sorted society and software developer money doesn’t buy you into the “having a say in the direction of the tech industry” class, not by a long shot, and especially not in 2026. If it even puts you in the “ever going to be able to actally retire” class it’s because you were already hanging onto the bottom of the investor class by the skin of your 401k.