Soviet Entropy

it’s literally a broken chain.

Literally a broken chain.
You could make a movie called ‘The Folly of the Phallus’ where a man shoots himself in the foot everytime he feels emotions and people would idolize the main characters and complain that the message wasn’t clear enough.

The evidence we have is that Swiss banks are likely key in how sanctions against Russia are being avoided.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-09-20/swiss-imports-of-russian-gold-climb-to-highest-since-april-2020

i believe this guy as far as i can throw him.
he was selling “anti-radiation” pills in japan and says the japanese government are spreading radioactive waste around the country to hide cancer cases from their experiments.

this post should be deleted.

you raise good points but they are already accounted for in CO2 emissions figures.

first, CO2 emissions peaked in the 1970s when the US imported much of its oil and when coal was used as the main fossil fuel. The switch away from coal is where much of the reduction comes from, which is why emissions can fall even tho oil production is high.

second, we don’t need to ask the US military what their emissions were. we know how much they purchased in fossil fuels and that’s where the estimates come from. the US military produces “51 million metric tons” each year, or about an extra 1% if you assume the numbers from https://www.eia.gov/environment/emissions/carbon/ don’t include it.

so in short, no. it is not assuming we ignore record oil production or the US military. as for exports, the US imports about as much energy as it exports.

since 2000 (after much of the off shoring of emissions from production), US emissions are down 25%.
this article is a poor polemic.

this article sucks.
it’s written by an apocalypticist and talks about global emissions instead of US domestic emissions.
https://www.eia.gov/environment/emissions/carbon/
CO2eq emissions have been decreasing in the US for at least a decade.

you can explain how having the public (specifically the demos using the greek idea of democracy) have input in government policy within the Chinese system. i only know about cuba’s system tho which is, in my opinion, the most democratic one there is.
do the public in China have the ability to recall their delegates?
do their delegates in the national assembly bring drafts of bills to them for community input at public meetings?
do they have referendums for major changes to laws and the constitution?
what portion of the delegates in the highest levels are people who aren’t career politicians?
etc. etc.

these are all things Cuba has but I don’t know if China has them. China might not be a democracy by any reasonable definition and even if you support its ruling party you should be open to that possibility while researching.

a major thing you might come across is that Chinese citizens will say that democracy means a government that does what the people want. it’s outcomes based. in the west we often focus entirely on process for defining democracy. but some are very restricted and insist that a democracy is a government made up of regular people, who are chosen by regular people, and who act for regular people (of, by, and for the people). it seems that in liberal circles they care more about the “by” and in China they care about the “for” and in ancient greece they cared about the “of”.

you aren’t going to convince your prof.
the term democracy is defined in many different ways by many different people. it’s an argument of semantics.
if your prof is a political scientist they are likely to be using/familiar with Polity, VDem, Freedom House, and the Democracy-Dictatorship Index. The important thing to note is that each of these essentially defines democracy as a government in which there are competitive multiparty elections. Anyone who defines democracy as requiring that will find it lacking in China and will never be convinced.
I would suggest stating that outright before explaining the ways in which the demos have say in government and control over government actions and ONLY if it is in line with your assignment.
China is not a democracy by any common definition used in western academia. Acknowledge this, and instead use it as an example of how the mainstream definitions of democracy are limited.

It will be a while before denuvo is cracked :(
I’m right there with you.

You are correct. This source, and many others from first world “third worldists” ignore this basic fact.
The term “unequal exchange” is misused by people. To say that profits come from unequal exchange is proudhonist, not marxist.
And this research paper assumes that all labor is of equal intensity.
Both are incorrect. This paper means nothing.

Labor in the third world of all skill levels produces less value per hour because of the lack of development of the means of production. Third world labor of equal skill produces less value in a global marketplace per hour when compared to that same labor applied to means of production in the developed first world. This is why the main task of every socialist government is to rapidly increase the stock of means of production and implement labor saving advances. i.e. a rapid industrialization.

There isn’t really a reason to do an “either or” here but a “yes and”.
Both have happened in every successful socailist revolution.
I think that for many regular people, “tax the rich” is not as tainted with anti-communist propaganda as “seize the means of production”. Taxing the rich does weaken them. Revolutions aren’t built in a day comrades.

This news is actually a little hard to interpret.
To quote the article: " The amount will now be diversified into corporate assets "
Japan’s central bank does bailouts of the capitalist class by purchasing stock. It owns 4.7% of all public stock in all of Japan.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-06/boj-becomes-biggest-japan-stock-owner-with-434-billion-hoard
So this may not be them moving toward abandoning the dollar (the watcher.guru article mentions that they are selling US and EU bonds but no percentages).