Seeing as we’re measuring dicks here.
That’s not what is going on, no. You called my work “fresh college-grad coding” and I described my experience to assure you that it is not. I made no intimations about the length of your dick, qualifications or credibility.
Good day, sir.
Oof. Lemmy as a decrepit grandma is a bit unkind.
Without their pioneering work in the early quiet days and absorbing the first wave of reddit refugees, PieFed wouldn’t have anything to glom onto and build from so there is a symbiosis going on.
Lemmy fixes this in v1.0.
never ever lose or bungle users’ data
This is a strawman. I reject your premise that losing or bungling user’s data is at risk here.
Yes the ‘answer’ value is on the comment but the full ActivityPub representation of the comment is only under the control of the comment author in the most narrow and technical sense - only for those who have access to the underlying database of their instance (to get the private key for signing the Activity). There is no realistic scenario where this becomes a big problem. And if it does, I can spit out a new release that changes it within a day.
This is a really small part of the picture and to dig down into one boolean value in a project of 50k lines of code and use that to dismiss the whole thing is just asinine.
High-fidelity community migration (no loss of followers) is on my to-do list for the next release. It might get bumped to the release after but it’s on the agenda.
Yeah PieFed searches for similar posts by url. Obvs that won’t work for posts without a url… Falling back to title would be easy but probably lots of false positives.
Haha
I have 25 years of experience at this and am well aware of the tradeoffs I’m making.
We’re not building a space shuttle, here. Lighten up.
Like what peertube has?
That’s ironic, because this post was written by a LLM. The edits are human but the bulk of the initial post is LLM text.