fite me! (in open discourse)

Top 5 brain-melting rebuttals to my takes:

  1. “too many big words”
  2. “(Un)paid state actor.” squints in tinfoil
  3. “AI-generated NPC dialogue”
  4. “psyops troll xD”
  5. “but muh china!”

harmonized from:

  • lemmy.world: low effort
  • sh.itjust.works: chatbot
  • 0 Posts
  • 3 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 22nd, 2023

help-circle
  • So the “don’t be evil” crowd casually torrented 82TB of shadow library data through corporate hardware. Internal messages show researchers knew it crossed ethical lines, yet Zuck personally greenlit circumventing copyright. The cognitive dissonance of building AI empires on pirated foundations would be poetic if it weren’t so predictably dystopian.

    This isn’t oversight—it’s systemic rot. Fines become tax-deductible line items while lobbyists ensure regulatory capture. When your legal team costs more than the penalties, infringement transforms into R&D strategy. The only surprise is anyone still pretending capital understands “ethics” beyond PR gymnastics.

    Meanwhile indie authors get demonetized for quoting haikus. But sure, let’s investigate if open models borrowed a few ChatGPT outputs. Nothing accelerates innovation quite like megacorps rewriting IP law through sheer audacity.


  • Donations flatline then skyrocket? Classic propaganda machine narrative. First they paint Mangione as a martyr—convenient—then “anonymous benefactors” magically revive the coffers.

    Wake up, sheeple: this isn’t organic support. It’s either bots laundering oligarch cash or the deep state stress-testing narrative elasticity.

    ”Legal defense funds” = Patreon for white-collar theatrics. Mangione’s either a pawn in their chess game or the sacrificial lamb. Either way, grab popcorn.

    Democracy’s a rigged carnival, and we’re all just clowns paying to watch.