do you need an explanation beyond “some people online will believe anything”
do you need an explanation beyond “some people online will believe anything”
good game
authoritarianism has worked for thousands of years.
The steel in todays wind turbine is the steel in a thousand years from now’s turbine, where as the co2 that got pumped into the atmosphere because that turbine wasn’t enough is also the co2 killing people in a thousand years
FYI making steel emits carbon: kinda the main point of the article.
The exponential relationship is between speed and energy, rather than height and speed.
The larger the wind turbine the better an investment it is.
For better or worse our green transition is primarily capitalist. That matters a lot here.
Wind speeds are significantly higher every meter you get above the ground. The larger the blade the better it performs. Windmills can’t cluster together too closely since they induce turbulence…
It all means that bigger is better here.
I don’t see anything punk about this at all, sorry. Reads anti-punk beginning to end.
They use steel more effectively, but use other resources like wind, land, labor, and electronics less effectively, and all of which are harder to recycle
Wind is a renewable resource. Saying wind is not easy to recycle is incoherent.
Electronics is the only one of the four you mentioned where recycling is a relevant concept.
As for wind farms being an effective use of land, that’s just obviously wrong. You can’t even have livestock near them.
As for less labour-efficient, I’d’ve thought that’s part of solarpunk: being less capital-intensive/more labour-intensive.
Steel can be pretty easily recycled, so it’s not too bad all in all.
All in all, it is roughly 9% of greenhouse gas emissions
The oil industry didn’t legally manipulate velomobiles into having a wide turning circle
This comment is rational.
For those inter-city bike lanes like you see in some parts of France they would be great.
I feel there’s probably some reasons they haven’t become popular.
Don’t turn as nimbly as a bike
Can’t put them on your shoulder and carry them indoors, onto a train, etc. like as a bike
Don’t climb hills as well as a bike (source)
20× the cost of a bike, maybe that could be brought down by economies of scale if they were more popular
I could imagine a velomobile being preferable if you’re commuting from a satellite town to the city, and the journey consists of a long straight road.
I’d definitely say they’re worse for getting around the city, and their comparative advantages are bought at the price of significant extra overhead.
Couldn’t care less.
not my circus not my monkeys
What your Trump-supporting journalist says –
Behind the scenes is China’s reluctance to forgive debt…
In the past under such circumstances, big government lenders such as the U.S., Japan and France would work out deals to forgive some debt, with each lender disclosing clearly what they were owed and on what terms so no one would feel cheated. But China didn’t play by those rules.
The actual facts –
No human society in any climate has ever been nocturnal: https://web.archive.org/web/20030318032208/http://condor.depaul.edu/~mfiddler/hyphen/humunivers.htm