• 2 Posts
  • 207 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 25th, 2025

help-circle
  • Ech@lemmy.catoMovies@lemmy.worldSuperman (2025)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    That’s an odd consensus. I’ve never seen it, but going off the summary, it maybe shares some similarities to one minor plot point in the 2025 movie, of which there are many, many others, most of which are commentary on (if not outright emulations of) very current affairs and trends that a movie from the 80s wouldn’t compare to at all.





  • It really just means a one-sided relationship with a fabricated personality. Celebrities being real people doesn’t really factor into it too much since their actual personhood is irrelevant to the delusion - the person with the delusion has a relationship with the made up personality they see and maintain in their mind. And a chatbot personality is really no different, in this case, so the terminology fits, imo.


  • Is it actually that hard to talk to another human?

    It’s pretty cruel to blame the people for this. You might as well say “Is it that hard to just walk?” to a paraplegic. There are many reasons people may find it difficult to nigh-impossible to engage with others, and these services prey on that. That’s not the fault of the users, it’s on the parasitic companies.







  • Ech@lemmy.catounix_surrealism@lemmy.sdf.orgthe myth of the good tech giant
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It’s not irrelevant. Using a corporate mascot as a symbol against another corporate mascot/product isn’t going to spread the message Louis intended. You argue the people complaining about it aren’t getting his point, but do you really think it will/has survived the word-of-mouth spreading it? The game of telephone that viral trends like this follow is lightning fast and warps messages in extreme ways. And it’s not much of a stretch to assume that, if MS churned out a new Clippy chatbot, people would rally around it to spite the others since they have no understanding of why they were doing it in the first place.

    *Also, people already mischaracterize the sincerity of early tech giants. I’ve certainly seen many people lament “the good Internet” of the mid 2000s, as if the very issues we have today weren’t percolating back then. None of those companies were ever good or harmless, the idea that them or their products are “different” now is naive, and relying on that naivety to push for change is a mistake.





  • it literally [skirts] the entire issue

    It literally doesn’t, as those companies can make these demands for whatever reason they want. The problem to solve isn’t “how do we appease the unreasonable processors”, it’s “how can we stop relying on these processors entirely”, and that’s a much bigger issue than Valve can solve on their own.

    Also, again, Steam already has this system. If that isn’t enough to avoid the issues, adding another proprietary economy certainly won’t.