d.rizo

I’m sure “The United States” was thinking real hard about that.

Maybe we should start reviewing churches the same way: Nice church but the guy at the front was talking funny about his imaginary friend… Only two stars.

Just plugged it in and gave it a try… My NES still works… The “just plugged it in” part was a bit tedious,… finding the right adapters,😅🤣

It’s funny that “they” are against solar… until “they” need it.

Vegetarian cat bring’s you part of it’s hunt.

So Larry is the manager…

My chitin is not your costume 🤣😂😜

Maybe, it’s the plaster holding in the wall box…

But the opportunity!!! ;)

Naaa,… it’s all about the money… I bet you there will be a “played tier”.

I only cautiously use AI. Most certainly because I see how, AI companies apply “flex tape” to fix issues. They themselves don’t realy know how the AI will behave and are only treating symptoms and ignore the real problem.

That’s why I think your stance on “we don’t ‘really’ know what AI is doing” is right. “Knowing the problem good enough to formalize the risks/policies” is a very valid point, but on the other hand, I think you would agree that we already solved such issues. Think about a “black box”.

If you see AI as a black box, you might come to a similar conclusion as the author.

I know that this is not the fix we need or even want. But better this than playing the beta tester for AI companies.

Modern version

Only Charlie’s grandparents are missing. 🤣

Not to misuse technical terms here but… What the flying fuckin’ fuck???