If all the people they killed come back alive and they’re still banned, all the killing they did wasn’t the reason for the ban.

…but they won’t come back.

I think it is clear that it’s just a matter of time that a faster, more secure, free and open source operating system will win over a worse alternative.

How do you do it? Wired headphones never last too long for me. The cable starts breaking after a while. What’s the trick?

What percentage of people smoke cigarettes compared to the percentage that do cocaine? Perhaps prohibition would dramatically reduce the number of users, even if that number is guaranteed to never reach 0?

I will not watch ads. That’s the first, unbreakable premise. If the service does not provide videos, I leave the service.

It’s not unreasonable, but if after taxing 3rd and 4th homes (etc.) to oblivion the issue persists, then also second homes should be taxed high. I truly believe that extreme would not be needed once it’s made humanely forbidden to own multiple homes without intention of ever living in them.

Worth adding that it should not be the number of homes what should be taxed, but based on the market value of those properties.