cannibalkitteh

Kermit the frog’s stunt double.

It’s so embarrassing when the parents stop by your work.

They don’t even have to do that. They can just do what my local politicians do and schedule it at the end of the meeting, limit testimony to 4 or so people, ignore that there’s hundreds of others that came to speak and 90% registered as opposed and then hastily vote and adjourn.

No, they were just drawing it out for the Odysseus Cinematic Universe.

For me post HRT, more of my arousal was mental and required more sensual touches, foreplay and buildup. With direct genital or anal contact, I’d usually get tired or sore before I would orgasm. I’ve also found that there’s a lot more depth to a full body orgasm, and that it can, but doesn’t have to involve me cumming in the traditional sense.

What if I want to watch the uncut version of a film?

Damn, Juicy Fruit gum killed Batman’s parents? And he’s been blaming The Joker all this time!

They never actually did pride logos this year.

Or the doctor won’t prescribe the one you know works unless you try 2-3 that gave you a psychotic break last time because “It works for most people”.

Misunderstood the assignment, the client asked for a heatmap, not a meatmap.

Would I be wrong to say (this is a damn shitty example so clearly wrong to make a point): I support trans rights, but I do not support their preference to use of animal-derived hormone replacement therapy instead of synthetic-derived, as it conflicts with my Vegan beliefs.

Yes, because you’ve moved the conversation away from one of support to a tangentially related topic that you wish to engage on. While occasionally, this can be a teachable moment or an honest discussion, more often than not, it is used to derail or poison the topic.

That’s because if you don’t rewind far enough back, the next person won’t see the unskippable FBI warning and will be immune from the FBI’s effects for the duration of the film.

The way I see it, if you as a user like a comic enough to research the artist, and you discover said artist holds values that are offensive to you, then you’ve learned something valuable. Plus, you get to make up your own mind whether you want to continue following said comic/artist.

Or a person who liked the artist enough that they went to look for more views it under the context of “I like this artist” so they’re more likely to rationalize or defend the extreme or questionable positions and the community remains complicit in platforming hate.

It is a fine line to walk as a mod (or person in power) to dictate what is and isn’t acceptable at any given moment.

That is literally the role of a mod?

I agree. It is a core function of moderation to be able to take a definitive stand and say “We won’t platform hate speech or those whose body of work is intractably entwined with hate”.

I guess what I am trying to say is that I feel that the content is not always a direct reflection of the bad values that their creators/portrayers may have.

I think on its own that makes sense, but without some blanket bans on known hateful artists, people are getting exposed to the innocuous works, and then looking up the artists to find a backlog of hateful content. And bad actors are free to limit test what extreme they can go to before any mod response.

Nun Jovi if you want to break into Christian rock.

Good name for a Bon Jovi cover band?

This is how you distinguish the American Shorthair from other shorthair breeds.

Epstein’s estate? There should be no fucking estate, burn that shit to the ground and salt the earth so nothing grows again.

Even more obvious solution: Let people use the bathroom.