🎲 Role player, Game master.
You can only go so far back, and then it won’t let you edit older posts. I tried many months ago.
Gotta make those cuts! /s
Cybersecurity is as important to national defense as the military is. And while they won’t mess with the military, all they want to do is cut things they don’t understand. They knee-jerk react to things and act as though they are making things better.
Biden was not on track, but he had an office for it.
https://www.sustainability.gov/federalsustainabilityplan/
For example, https://sdgs.un.org/sites/default/files/publications/21252030 Agenda for Sustainable Development web.pdf
Goal 13. Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts*
I can’t prove you wrong, but your post made me wonder this: Senator Ted Stevens in 2006, said that “the Internet is a series of tubes”. Every one of those tubes must have an end. The Anus is the end of a tube (the lower intestine). Therefore, the Internet is a series of anuses. Prove me wrong.
Dude gave anyone looking for forensic clues a layup
would lock every employee out of their accounts if his credentials were ever revoked, and named the code IsDLEnabledinAD, as in “Is Davis Lu enabled in Active Directory.”
That’s kind of an easy figure out: look for all the D.L.s in the company and work from there. But then
investigators subsequently found the source code for this program on an internal development server in Kentucky, and that Lu’s user account had been used to execute the malware on the production box. Lu was also the only member of his team who had access privileges for that dev machine.
This guy left an easy forensic trail.
I’m not saying he’s doing this, but if you announce a tariff, and the stock market tanks, it is cheaper to buy more stocks… Then wait until the rebound to sell.
However, a day ago, the Trump reversal didn’t save the stock market. https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/stock-market-today-trump-s-tariff-reversal-can-t-save-stocks/ar-AA1ApkHl
That may not be his plan, but his “I’m going to effect a tariff… PSYCH!” really doesn’t make a lot of sense. Unless it’s a buy low, sell high strategy, I am at a loss for what he is doing.
I tried Ghost archive, but no luck. I found this on Reuters:
The problem is that few stand up to Trump publicly. Those who do (Liz Cheney as an example), are ostracized by the Republican Party. While the Supreme Court shouldn’t be political, Trump could get Congress to expand the number of judges (because which of them are going to stand against Trump?), which would allow the court to be packed with judges who play his game his way.
I have to disagree. It’s not a bad sign because he can ignore the courts. “The Supreme Court ruled that former presidents have broad immunity from criminal prosecution for actions taken while in office, particularly those related to their core executive functions.” He has been ignoring the courts. While his staffers can get in to trouble, he can pardon them for disobeying court orders. Or he can get someone else to disobey court orders, whatever he chooses to do. The Supreme Court has made a colossal mistake with this ruling.
Have you tried turning it off and back on again?