Both, al jazeera source says the explosive inside is PETN. What I’m asking is how tf did text messages and whatever in the walkie talkies ignite a spark strong enough to ignite the PETN? Is that true? Or is it possible some of these are still live or ignited in a faulty way? What is the risk to the public?

Afaik such an idea was nonsense previously. Why are we taking their word that this is sophisticated at any level when they’ve been simply brutal up to now?

Cups with strings

Anyone else confused about how these bombs are actually detonating? Articles say they are detonating via a text message sent 3x in error, theoretically causing either a spark or a “closed circuit” like a different article explained. The article (from al jazeera) says they have to look at the message but there’s video of one igniting in a bag.

I’m curious because I think these pagers may actually constitute a public safety risk, similar to how heavily landmined areas risk exploding even decades later on someone unrelated to the initial conflict.

EU can straight up send Elon on a one way ticket to space and I hope the US does nothing

Why can’t fascists use this tool to network with each other?

Also, it would be more effective to have a map of rapists and dangerous men imo. I could and would contribute significantly to that type of list. A lot of wealthy men who are rapists are also white supremacists. I don’t think I’ve ever been sexually assaulted by someone who WASN’T revealed to be racist.

Yes, I am very curious to hear about ideas for campaign reform. Hard for me to imagine alternatives, for some reason

They should be charged an emissions tax and worker safety tax since driving to/from work is one of the leading causes of death for working adults

Of course, there are more perspectives than there are people

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Lmfao that’s NOT the original argument. Look again. The original argument is mine, the parent comment. Saying Dems should always be bringing up approval choice voting.

Democrats should combat this by advocating for ranked choice or approval choice voting which is a fairer voting system and won’t allow for “spoilers”

The other commenter then unraveled in their efforts to lick Democrat boots by saying it was simultaneously wanted by “most Dems” in legislation, while being too complicated for the average Dem voter base. Go read again. Notice how I never specified Dem voters or Dem politicians? That was on purpose. I meant the whole party, both voters and candidates. That’s why the 1 bill isn’t refuting my point and it’s why the other person gave up.

Then they posted 1 Dem’s bill, saying it was by ‘some of the most senior Dems,’ and saying ‘most Dems would support it,’ then also got upset I suggested we talk about it more. Btw paraphrasing/summarizing isn’t a strawman lol.

1bill being introduced a few times was never the debate. It was never the original issue. Read again, kiddo

For the record, if you agree then you are only doing this to be abusive. You’re delivering this abusively. You could choose to ‘yes, and.’ You seem to enjoy abusing the only openly woman commenter here. Creepy of you.

You straight up sound like someone who would get posted on r/iamverysmart.

Projection on your part. I have never cared about my ego and “appearing smart.” But you’ve brought it up a bit. For no reason except your own embarrassing hubris

You’re literally just fucking stupid.

This is why you’re doing this - to be abusive to women. Got it. Or explain why your verbal abuse/ad hominem is acceptable? Reported either way.

Eta: it was abusive enough a mod removed your comment. My comments didn’t get removed because I’m not abusive.

You were wrong.

No.

No.

No.

Removed by mod

Nah, you clearly hate women. Bye

I’m not interested in talking with you

K