Dude probably cleaned his house, paid his bills, organized the garage, updated his resume…
Dude probably cleaned his house, paid his bills, organized the garage, updated his resume…
Only headache is assuming whoever found it could read it, and parse it.
Requires microscopy and a compute model of the right standard, right?
Like to actually parse the bits…
Sure super aliens could but could post apocalyptic humans in a few centuries, who have regained enough stability to care about such things?
Say checksum again
Homie out here only ponderin in 3d.
Well I assume writing is one-time, so the speed is not really an issue
Right. If the company keeps their money, they have money, for money things. Like giving the staff money, to make others products for money.
If they stack all their money, shove it up a lawyer’s ass, and send them waddling in the Nintendo front door, they apparently have bravery, but, alas, no money.
It would be poor leadership to “go into the ground”.
Hmm it is good to highlight if the company can remotely disable the vehicle.
That means they could also remotely change the driving characteristics, as long as it had a data connection. Like, disabling the brakes.
This dude is shit and musk is shit but this is a universal worry for web connected vehicles.
If I recall correctly such tampering was suspected to even be involved in a journalist’s death way back in 2013. However this is speculation.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Hastings_(journalist)
He’s daffy duckin
Right observer could be observing unlabeled lol
Right and their current assessment (from their legal team) clearly is that they have a case to defend themselves.
Yuzu, based on their actions, determined they didn’t.
Edit as such, spending the money would have been just burning it.
It’s not bravery
The claims are very different. I’m not moving the goalposts here, it’s critical to the situation and was always available information.
What’s millions to Nintendo? Yuzu’s a business at it’s core. they are designed to make money
Lol this is hilarious. “Coward”. Have you ever looked down the barrel of an enterprise legal team, and seen just the opening bill to defend team? I haven’t, but I’m aware that it is a huge and expensive endeavor and “bravery” has nothing to do with it.
I’m not defending it, but how is this different than targeted strikes with gps guided weapons, including the katanabomb? That also has collateral damage.
One can suggest the west is engaged in terrorism in that way too, and I personally believe such strikes only create more terrorists.
But clearly most of the global community agrees with certain targeted strikes on terrorists. This is just a particular flavor of it, and is another shitty feature of the modern “war on terror”.
Another comment said that this is just going to further the violence for another decade (among the other shit Israel is up to) and I agree that the conflict IS the point.
It fucking sucks.
They carry very different loads, and both are awesome.
That would be a rare, shiny PEM
The point is he doesn’t want to be offed, the suggestion being he knows about Epstein level stuff, and the rich hate a snitch.
If only a cock inspecting asexual were there that day to provide some clarity