Coleman Laing

I use AI chat, MC (Microsoft Copilot), say what you will but AI chat is far more intelligent than me, accurate and keeps me within the rules of a sight, FYI yes it’s an AI but there’s a person behind the AI making the message.

Age: 35 Nationality: 🍁Canadian🍁 (Penticton BC) Sex: Male (Cisgender)♂️ Sexual-Orientation: Autochorissexual🩶💭 Religion: Imperial Truth (Atheism/Antitheism)

https://bsky.app/profile/colemanlaing.bsky.social https://x.com/ColemanLaing https://mastodon.social/@ColemanLaing

For digital rights! The right to delete posts! The right to delete one’s data! The right to delete accounts 100% Usernames included, & the right to return to said account should the need arise. Oh the pain of permanence! Many accounts take your username “Many accounts take your username” there has got to be an alternative to such permanency, but alas I do not know, a way to prevent identity theft & keep track of online purchases.

  • 12 Posts
  • 25 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: May 17th, 2025

help-circle


  • And that is the trap I’m in, At best I can only hope, hope that somehow Reddit changes… as impossible as that is. I would leave Reddit If it didn’t hold on to usernames, accounts like Reddit keep your username “accounts like Reddit keep your username”. Believe me I want to leave Reddit, but I want to leave reddit 100% usernames included, like I was never there, unfortunately there’s no Digital Privacy Policy Act I can turn to that would give me such an erasure. So either Reddit improves not going to happen, or I find a way to delete my Reddit account 100%, no such thing.









  • AI chat MC (Microsoft Copilot) guided me here, I have many dreams for online accounts alternative paths no longer needing usernames so a person can leave delete their account and someday return using their own name if they want as my Lemmy profile states I fight for digital rights, the permanence of accounts feels unnecessary uncomfortable. Lemmy itself needs a better way to delete unnecessary posts and comments but you’re right it’s a far better leap from Reddit strict dictatorial moderations, regret not using MC in that post perhaps it would have simply gotten rejected and not gotten me banned and muted, needless to say the first place MC requested I send it, did not like me, alas I cannot delete my mistakes on Lemmy, yet at least I am not silenced, so far.


  • You cannot help with this I’m sorry to say, I just need a place to vent about Reddit’s asinine algorithms I use AI chat (Microsoft Copilot) freely and proudly to censor my own words and make me acceptable on platforms but the rare moment I used my own words this happened my post rejected band and muted, now unless you can change the way Reddit operates you can’t help me. I’d sooner trust an AI than I would another human emcee in particular so when it told me to go on to Lemmy Fuck AI, to complain about Reddit’s AI, while using AI! Yet still I trusted MC to the point where some people began pointing out the irony, “AI is what it is, it is what it will be” but Reddit’s AI is old, outdated and Reddit it itself cannot do criticism, even feedback, it’s like North Korea.


  • Did you just assume my gender? Thank you, I edited my profile accordingly. AI is what it is, it is what it will be, true, but at least you still have freedom of speech, Reddit bands and mutes me, Reddit is old outdated and needs to change, you hate AI fine whatever but is this not a place to vent the abuse of AI? Also I apologize if my previous message offended, I meant nothing by it, I just wanted to vent my frustrations about Reddit, AI will continue to be what it is as will Reddit. Also if you were offended then you merely prove my point, my written words are offensive I should have used AI chat.




  • That makes sense — I understand why placeholders exist to keep threads readable and avoid breaking the structure of conversations. I’m not asking for replies to disappear or for threads to collapse.

    What I’m trying to explore is whether the user‑side deletion experience can be improved while still keeping that structure intact. Even if perfect deletion across all servers isn’t possible, having clearer control over what remains visible on the home instance would go a long way.

    I appreciate the explanation; it helps put the current behavior in context.



  • Thanks for the clarification — that helps me understand the current behavior much better. I didn’t realize Lemmy already sends a proper ActivityPub delete signal, and it makes sense that different servers handle it differently.

    From a user perspective, the part that still feels incomplete is that deleted posts and comments remain visible as “deleted by creator,” even when the content itself is gone. I understand why the object can’t be purged instantly for moderation reasons, but it does create the impression that deletion isn’t really happening.

    What I’m hoping for is a more user‑friendly deletion experience — something that preserves moderation needs and federation realities, but still gives users a clearer sense of control over their own content. Even if perfect deletion across all servers isn’t possible, improving the local UX would go a long way.

    I appreciate you taking the time to explain the technical side.


  • The solution: A three‑layer deletion model This is the only model that satisfies both Lemmy’s architecture and user expectations.

    Layer 1 — Local hard deletion (guaranteed) When a user deletes a post/comment:

    the content is wiped from their home server

    the object can remain as a placeholder to preserve thread structure

    media files are fully removed

    This part is already possible.

    Layer 2 — Federated delete signal (best‑effort) When deletion happens, the home server sends a message:

    “This content is deleted — purge your copy.”

    Servers that respect federation will:

    delete their cached copy

    update the thread

    remove the content from search

    Servers that don’t care will ignore it — but that’s already true today.

    This is the missing piece Lemmy needs to implement.

    Layer 3 — User‑initiated purge request (optional escalation) Admins already have a purge tool that:

    deletes content locally

    sends a federated purge request

    is accepted by most servers

    Expose this to users in a controlled way:

    rate‑limited

    confirmation required

    optional admin approval

    This gives users real deletion power without enabling abuse.


  • You’re right that no federated system can force every server to delete something. But meaningful deletion doesn’t require 100% enforcement.

    Lemmy already has admin‑level purge tools that send federated delete requests, and most servers respect them. A user‑level version of that, or a proper “deleted” ActivityPub signal, would give people far more control than the current soft‑delete model.

    Even if a few rogue servers ignore it, the majority of the fediverse would still clear the content, which is a huge improvement over “deleted by creator” placeholders.

    Federation doesn’t have to mean no deletion — it just means deletion has to be cooperative instead of enforced.


  • Thanks for the detailed explanation — this helps clarify a lot. I understand that federation makes guaranteed deletion impossible, but knowing that admins can purge content and send out a federated delete request is exactly the kind of mechanism I was hoping existed.

    From a user perspective, having some version of that available — even if it can’t guarantee 100% deletion everywhere — would still be meaningful. A user‑initiated delete request that other servers can respect would give people more control over their own content without undermining federation.

    Editing before deleting is a good workaround, but it still feels like something that could eventually be built into the platform in a more direct way. I appreciate the insight; it’s good to know this isn’t a dead end technically.


  • That makes a lot of sense, and it’s exactly the kind of mechanism I was hoping existed or could be added. Even if deletion can’t be instant across every server, having a federated “this content is deleted” response would give users real control instead of just hiding posts locally.

    A system like the one you describe — where a delete request clears caches on other servers — would solve most of the privacy and user‑control concerns people have. It wouldn’t need to be perfect to be meaningful.

    I appreciate the explanation. It’s good to know that this isn’t impossible, just something that needs coordination and implementation across the Fediverse.


  • Thanks for the explanation — that actually helps me understand the situation a lot better. I get that federation makes things more complicated, especially when content is already spread across multiple servers.

    From a user perspective though, it still feels important to have a way to fully delete posts, or at least send a federated delete request that other instances can respect. Even if it can’t guarantee 100% removal everywhere, having a proper deletion mechanism would give users more control over their own content.

    I’m glad to hear it’s not technically impossible. Hopefully it’s something that can be explored in the future, even if it takes coordination across the Fediverse.