• 0 Posts
  • 156 Comments
Joined 16 days ago
cake
Cake day: January 21st, 2026

help-circle
  • To me, what you’re describing is a rather strict budget.

    It’s similar to the old style of budgeting where you pay for everything in cash out of envelopes. So, you have a “rent” envelope and a “food” envelope, and etc, and you cash your paycheck, and put specific amounts into each envelope, and that’s all you can spend on that until the next paycheck.

    Only in your case, it’s like you only have one envelope labeled “absolute necessities”, and almost everything went in there.

    By the way, when you’re poor, it’s probably important to be able to spend any extra money like you did. It’s one of the traps of being poor, but it’s very difficult and unrewarding to live a life of complete deprivation.














  • Assume for a moment that AI really was taking all of these types of jobs, which by the way, almost certainly includes CEOs. It would only be a matter of time before robots take those other jobs he’s talking about.

    A normal human of normal intelligence would see that and conclude that people simply wouldn’t have to work anymore. And that therefore, everyone should have their basic necessities taken care of by their governments.

    People would be free to do whatever they want, whether it be “humanities” work or creating things or whatever. We’re no longer constrained by the fact that our lives depend on our usefulness in jobs to the ruling class.

    Only a member of that ruling class would see themselves as indispensable and others as slave labor.


  • First, it was a joke in response to a joke. That much should be obvious to anyone. So it has the accuracy inherent in a joke.

    And second, since it was about large numbers of people, it was obviously a claim about the vast majorities and not a statement indicating, for example, that there were zero exceptions.

    The offense is more in the responses than in the original comment. The comment first got many upvotes because it’s obviously a joke. But then some people with poor reading comprehension invented offense and responded like it was obvious, then everyone started acting like chickens with their heads cut off. The people who could read and think for themselves didn’t respond because it’s obviously just a stupid joke.




  • I suspect it’s even simpler than that. If you simply assume that people don’t change at all once they grow up, everything can be explained.

    People are generally more selfish than we think and people lie more to fit in than we think.

    Selfish people like social programs when they are young and might theoretically need help, but don’t care about taxes because they earn little.

    And they dislike taxes when they are old and have salaries and resources, but don’t care about social programs because they don’t qualify.

    They don’t care about politics or political parties because they really only care about themselves. They never really cared.

    Others pretend to be left leaning to match their peers when they’re young and right leaning to match when they’re older. They don’t care about politics as much as fitting in.



  • Yes, of course. You cannot be serious. One, he’s the only male victim that I’ve heard of, and I’ve only just heard of him. Every news source talks about victims as girls or “young women.” So, every news source, even to this very day also implies that that class doesn’t exist.

    When I tried to search for his story, I had to use more than one search engine to find anything. DuckDuckGo literally had zero results for “Trump ‘tent stake’”. I had to go to google.

    I’m glad that you’re out there letting people know about this guy, but you know that his class is a small minority and almost unknown to the mainstream.