This is a foundational model, and like many early-stage theories, it begins by proposing a new framework rather than conforming to existing ones. The “equations from thin air” are not arbitrary—they emerge from a single principle: tension (pressure differential) as the driver of emergence. This principle is explored through both simulation and recursive analysis.

The framework does not assume fundamental particles or fields—it posits emergence from imbalance itself. Pressure and tension in this context are not analogies but descriptors of system instability across recursive layers. That’s precisely why dimensionality and structure unfold as outcomes, not inputs.

As for units, I agree this needs refinement, and I’m in the process of standardizing definitions and dimensional analysis across the paper. That’s part of transitioning from raw model to publishable form.

And yes—the parameters are currently tuned manually. This is an early simulation stage. You’re right to challenge that. But early-stage models, from cosmology to climate science, begin with manual parameter fitting to find viable behaviors. The next step is automation, testing against empirical datasets, and refining the bounds of those parameters.

Thank you for your feedback. I’ll prepare a LaTeX version with full mathematical notation.

deleted by creator

Landlords are not greedy. They are inherently parasitic.

Pretty sure that guy shit in his hat.

Feel - acknowledge - think - act

deleted by creator

Just some advice for other men. “Reason is, and ought to be the slave of the passions.” Fellas, listen to your heart and speak your truth. You can’t think your way out of feeling; your heart gives no fucks about reason or correctness. Be gentle with yourself, be honest, and don’t suppress yourself. We are all complex primates who require complex care. Care for yourself.

AI won’t be able to write better than a human with skill. Y’all motherfuckers are only being technophobes because you suck dick and can’t recognize what quality means in any circumstance, really. AI is so ridiculously primitive that you can really only blame yourselves for sucking so bad.

On the surface. But, you’re being rhetorical, in the original sense of the word. You can link words together but fail to do logic. You’re doing duckspeak, quack quack

You’re just gatekeeping, not looking at what makes art that

You have no comprehension of relevance.

The early 20th century? I’d say physical philosophy would beg to differ, and do you see how you just killed your own argument by citing a time period? I think ideas don’t have value and that intellectual property stifles innovation. You had me in the first half, where I assumed you meant that people don’t just intuit new ideas from nowhere, then you cited a date and lost me.

Easy. Don’t work a job or pay rent. Anarchism already exists. It just exists in the crannies (like right in front of you) where other domineering primates don’t beat you with sticks or boss you around. You don’t fix the system. You ignore it.

As an artist, all y’all need to chill. The problem is capitalism, and it’s not like artists make a living anyway. Democratizing art opens up a lot of possibilities, you technophobes.

You really should catch up with the rest of us on leftist ideology. Also, realize that the scary picture in your head with no government is exactly the world we live in, today, while the government simply wages wars for corporations and keeps itself intact by commodifying human behavior.

Is this guy on drugs?

Yes, calls to violence. I give no fucks about policy. My policy is that we should shoot cops in the face when we see them.

Hey, I might be able to become a Canadian refugee. Sweet

So, we don’t do government