I see many socialists on X and Instagram that are not on Mastodon, why is that? Is there a socialist argument as to why these organizations are still there, and should we join them?

  • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    33 minutes ago

    As Communists, it’s important to engage with even reactionary-controlled spaces in order to agitate. Lenin made this clear in “Left”-Wing Communism. That being said, we should also promote spaces like Lemmy and Mastodon while on more reactionary spaces, as we can create our own, Proletarian controlled spaces free from the censorship of corporate media.

    Each plays a different role, but ultimately we should be where the working class is.

    At least, that’s my belief.

      • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 minutes ago

        Yep! It won’t always be the comfiest spaces for us, but without a strong attachment to the broader working class, it’s hard to actually build up those other spaces that are comfy.

  • amemorablename@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 minutes ago

    Personally… Twitter (when it was still Twitter) helped get me to where I am now in knowledge and beliefs. Lemmygrad has helped me on some things as well, like the Russia-Ukraine situation. Reddit drove me more toward a “anyone could be a political bot” rabbithole of thinking in years prior to that. But also, the way it went on Twitter was helped a lot by people in the orbit of Bernie Sander’s campaign at the time, so some of it may have been pure timing.

    So in my own experiences, Twitter was helpful at points, but Reddit was largely a cesspool. There are probably people here who were helped by Reddit though, cause if I understand right, this was born out of one of the only ML subs on Reddit?

    Some people can be reached on the large platforms. But I tend to think you need to consider your own situation too. If you’re an org or style of “pundit” who is trying to grow and get messaging out, it makes sense to be on the big platforms to reach more people. If you’re an individual, you may struggle more with when and how much to post about what, and get burned out in irate arguments that lead nowhere. The kind of mainstays I remember from Twitter tended to come across as people who either had a lot of patience to keep at it regularly or were the fighting type and could give as good as they get without growing weary of it.

  • pcalau12i@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I just sometimes use bigger platforms because, well, the point of social media is to socialize. It’s not as fun if there’s not many people there.

  • Commiejones@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The only purpose to be on the corporate social media platforms is to agitate. I know I was radicalized by posters and I know I have pushed a couple people left with my posting. If you think you do better work IRL that’s cool.

    • ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      ineffective at best, orgs should focus instead on going outside and moving to decentralized platforms for information sharing.

      host your own site, hand out leaflets, open stalls; posting on mainstream social media is a dead end and only drives engagement with fascists and people who dont go outside, neither of who are productive.

      • star (she)@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        My org has our website, flyers on a weekly basis and does stalls at bigger events AND posts about it on mainstream social media. I don’t see a problem with it

        • ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          AND posts about it on mainstream social media

          And when the fascists are in power they will have every member on those social medias sites details, well done!

          Why are we giving traffic and org details to the enemy again, do you understand who owns these websites?

          • star (she)@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            i dont really understand how you propose promoting an org or doing mass communications. by that logic no org member should own a phone because it could be traced, or because its produced by capitalist businesses.

        • ComradeIntergalactic@lemmygrad.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Claiming “nobody is on Mastodon” is a lazy excuse to avoid it. The stats are clear that there is a stark difference, but regardless, organizations should be there too.

          • star (she)@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 hours ago

            There isn’t really a good reason to spend resources on a platform that barely has any people on it.

  • metaStatic@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I strongly believe the means are the ends. if your only presence is on corporate fascist socials that says everything.