• theneverfox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean, that score supposedingly means you struggle to put together normal sentences… So I’d assume it’s satire

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      86 is still way above an intellectual disability, that limit is set below 70.

      An IQ of 86 is not THAT low, the percentile in the pic is right, about 1 in 6 people is below 86.

    • Enkrod@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 day ago

      Oh goodness no, with an IQ of 86, most people wouldn’t even peg you as surprisingly stupid, maybe a bit slow. This is still very much in the “slightly below average” column. The 70s are “below average” and only below that do you get into disability territory.

      People overestimate the effect a not-even-20-points deviation has in real life. Just like people with an IQ of 114 are a just your average Janes and aren’t generally geniuses, people with 86 are still your average Joes and generally not noticeable. 82,2% of all people are between 80 and 120. And you can’t tell me that you actually think of every fifth to sixth person around you as exceptional (in either direction).

    • Marte@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      86 is not that noticeable, as others have pointed out. Also, there’s a high chance this post was GPT-produced

    • RobotZap10000@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Can you really be sure that he actually wrote something himself in 2025? Something that wasn’t a prompt?