• knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Every serious children’s advocacy group has actual recommendations to protect children while not invading privacy. Of course those won’t be implemented because the ruling class would be implicated in nasty shit and it wouldn’t further their goal of surveilling and censoring the plebs.

  • Crabmeat@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    12 hours ago

    So what if somebody has nudity in their photos? It’s a perfectly normal thing, provided the photos were taken with consent. It’s never about protecting the children, and the puritanism is simply a peanut butter coating to get busybodies and christians to gobble it up. It’s all surveillance.

  • devaly@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Maybe they should put something into the politicians phones to detect corruption