Bemotrizinol
Is this one of the ones that don’t kill fish?
My impression has been that research doesnt actually support the concerns about sunscreen harming reefs, and that it was like one paper, the conclusions from which haven’t been supported by wider reaseach? I could totally be wrong, I don’t remember details very well
Are we thinking of the same thing? Not sure if there’s another aquatic life impact people are concerned about with UV filters used in sunscreen
This paper isn’t free at the link but you can read the abstract, partially quoted below:
“We examined the effects of oxybenzone on the larval form (planula) of the coral Stylophora pistillata, as well as its toxicity in vitro to coral cells from this and six other coral species. Oxybenzone is a photo-toxicant; adverse effects are exacerbated in the light. Whether in darkness or light, oxybenzone transformed planulae from a motile state to a deformed, sessile condition. Planulae exhibited an increasing rate of coral bleaching in response to increasing concentrations of oxybenzone. Oxybenzone is a genotoxicant to corals, exhibiting a positive relationship between DNA-AP lesions and increasing oxybenzone concentrations. Oxybenzone is a skeletal endocrine disruptor; it induced ossification of the planula, encasing the entire planula in its own skeleton.”
Also there’s this: 11/19/21-MAUI COUNTY COUNCIL PASSES HISTORIC BILL PROHIBITING NON-MINERAL SUNSCREENS
Because I am specifically thinking it may have been a paper that researchers dont feel reflect the broader body of evidence, I’d probably consider a meta analysis or systematic review more meaningful thank just one paper, as that paper may be the one I’m thinking of that is regarded as not accurately portraying the risk
I might be entirely mixed up, I may try to go looking for what I’m thinking of. If I do I’ll try to provide an update
That’s pretty awesome. Shame it won’t be in time for this summer.
We get brief summers in all the seasons now thanks to climate change
It’s the UV that is the issue not the heat. Unless climate change shifts the tilt of Earths axis, your likelihood or receiving the rays will be more or less the same per season.
You’re right about the seasons remaining the same but climate change does have an effect on the clouds in the sky, meaning climate change does effect how much uv-light reaches the surface of our planet, despite the earth continuing to rotate around itself and the sun in the same way.
It was more a joke about how we can go out in shorts a few weeks in every season now because of the extreme microclimate changes.
What about us shorts all year round folks? I guess I need to move RReaLLLY car south or a little more north
Of course I know him, he’s me, there’s literally dozens of us
