EatingOnions@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 1 day ago‘We don’t want to be cannon fodder’: Lukashenko rules out sending troops to Ukrainetvpworld.comexternal-linkmessage-square13linkfedilinkarrow-up1130arrow-down10 cross-posted to: ukrainianconflict@lemmit.online
arrow-up1130arrow-down1external-link‘We don’t want to be cannon fodder’: Lukashenko rules out sending troops to Ukrainetvpworld.comEatingOnions@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square13linkfedilink cross-posted to: ukrainianconflict@lemmit.online
minus-squaretestaccount372920@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 day agoBelarus has said since the start of the war that they won’t send troops, so nothing new. It also makes sense, since they’re both a buffer zone between Russia and NATO, and they’re awfully much in strike range of Ukrainian aerial attacks.
minus-squareCalavera@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·12 hours agoHow can they be a buffer zone if Russia can use them as base for attacks anytime they want?
minus-squaretestaccount372920@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·11 hours agoBuffer zone for Russia, not for NATO
minus-squareCalavera@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-211 hours agoSo they sending troops to support Russia don’t change the status quo
minus-squareOptional@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 day agoYes but Luka is owned completely and totally by Pooty-poot, so he wouldn’t announce that if it hadn’t been vetted, right?
Belarus has said since the start of the war that they won’t send troops, so nothing new. It also makes sense, since they’re both a buffer zone between Russia and NATO, and they’re awfully much in strike range of Ukrainian aerial attacks.
How can they be a buffer zone if Russia can use them as base for attacks anytime they want?
Buffer zone for Russia, not for NATO
So they sending troops to support Russia don’t change the status quo
Yes but Luka is owned completely and totally by Pooty-poot, so he wouldn’t announce that if it hadn’t been vetted, right?