• oats@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    You mean inconvenient. At this point, it’s a lot less hassle just to use sepa instant.

    I want to send you money.

    “Hey, does your bank support wero? Great. I need your phone number. No, my bank doesn’t support sending to emails. OK, I saved it to my contacts, I can now open my bank app and send you your 5€.”

    vs

    “5€? Sure. opens banking app what’s your iban? OK, done”

      • oats@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        15 for a phone number, so only twice as bad.

        And then not, as Iban has a checksum so you’ll directly see errors, as opposed to a phone which will just reach the wrong person

        • Calavera@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          15 for a phone number? Where do you live too have such a big number? Here I have only 9 and phone numbers are easily remembered, most people know their own number, and bet <1% of people are know their IBAN.

          You are trying to invent a scenario where IBAN transfers are simple, but that’s simply not true, otherwise payment methods such as wero wouldn’t even exist

          • oats@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Germany. There are older numbers that are only 14 digits, bit that’s about it, for mobile.

            And to be fair, wero doesn’t really exist :D