• Solumbran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    6 days ago

    You can’t compare the companionship of a pet, with carrying a rock on your hand. The ring costs money and brings absolutely nothing (and people in awe of the beauty of wedding rings are full of shit), the cat is a life that goes through existence with you for years.

    You can’t just compare a cost of life, with the cost of a stone, the two don’t have the same value.

    • mysticpickle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yeah, cat > diamond ring in both emotional utility and actual monetary cost.

      I was specifically pointing out that the comment about the ring putting them in more monetary debt than the cat is wrong. A 1-carat diamond ring is going to set you back a couple grand. The costs to raise a cat throughout its lifespan is very likely going to be several times larger than that.

    • Jack@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      cost of life

      Should we save about 1.4 to 3.7 billion wild birds a year, by ending the pet cat industry?

      • Solumbran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yes because on top of the moral responsibility of humans over the behavior of cats, they are also destructive for the environment and keeping them out causes a lot of problems.

        Ideally in a perfect world pets would either not be allowed of extremely limited anyway.