The two main issues I see are:

  • In any kind of anarchist system, the need for financial capital is replaced by a need for social capital. It’s easy to tell people “jUsT go TaLk To YoUr NeIgHbOrS” and hard for many people to do. There should be room in society still for people who don’t feel like talking

  • Locally grown and unprocessed foods with unpredictable taste and texture

If you see any more problems or solutions then you can comment them below

EDIT: I tried to delete this post but I don’t really know how. I deleted it but it still shows up. Sry for the bad post

EDIT 2: I guess I will undelete if it’s going to show up on the feed either way

  • Rioting Pacifist@lemmy.world
    16·
    13 days ago

    the need for financial capital is replaced by a need for social capital

    I don’t really agree with that, under anarchism (or at least types of Anarchism that I think will be stable enough to reproduce themselves) everyone will have to be provided with what they need regardless of capital (financial or social), the advantage of universal services is that they are universal, if you start rationing access because you think someone was rude to you, then you lose that benefit and are arguably not in an anarchistic system anymore.

    Locally grown and unprocessed foods with unpredictable taste and texture

    I can’t help with that, but if people need food cooking particular ways I don’t see how that is different from other needs, society only benefits from universal access to food if it’s truly universal and that means someone has to take a cooking class on how to cook for people with particular diatery requirements that’s fine.