• 3volver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes, simple. Easy to explain to the average person, easy to implement. Now, as for our overlords with all the money allowing it? Complicated.

      • Liz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        RCV is completed enough that it’s causing disenfranchisement problems with poor and low education voters. Better to go with approval voting, which gets the same results while making invalid ballots impossible.

        The way we make that happen is by starting with local referendums and working our way up. It’s a lot of work, but it’s the main way good stuff happens in our democracy.

        • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          That abstract describes disenfranchisement due to overvote, which is choosing more candidates than allowed. If these fucking morons cannot follow directions, they likely are too stupid to be trusted to vote. I’d rather that type of self culling than the current methods.

        • 3volver@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s the kind of change you don’t ask for permission to change. I don’t think the system is capable of reforming itself.