• bearboiblake@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    uhhh, maybe you should?

    left wingers have zero respect for laws and will make the world better and fairer by any means necessary.

    as a leftist if I somehow got control of the state I would immediately order for the rounding up and execution of every single person in the country who is either a corporate executive for a top-250 corporation or in possession of assets worth 100 million or more.

    because that would be the most efficient way of rapidly reducing the risk of the wealthy wresting back control.

    and it would be totally ethical

    as for gandhi and MLK, well, india is a fascist dictatorship and, well, how are things looking for black people in the US?

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Not to bat for the disgustingly wealthy, but at the point Leftists have had a successful revolution, we don’t need to execute them outright, just lift their assets and jail them if they resist, or execute if they go on to become terrorists. Learn from successful revolutions, when the Cuban revolution succeeded Castro was actually very lenient in comparison to Batista.

      Revolution is bloody, and we won’t make excuses, but at a certain point it risks dogmatism. Billionaires aren’t like Minecraft characters that drop their inventories on death, revolution is actually very sensible because it’s a lot easier to sieze their assets when the working class has control.

      • bearboiblake@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        don’t get me wrong, if the choice for a non-violent revolution is there, i would take it every time.

        but if, somehow, i magically became the president without any kind of revolutionary effort, that’s what i would do, and i would be totally justified in doing so

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          I am not advocating against revolution, I’m a Communist. If you became president of the US without revolution, you would not be able to execute any Capitalist you wanted, that’s more what I am saying. Temper your dogmatism with pragmatism, read theory and study past successful revolutions, such as in the USSR, China, Cuba, Algeria, etc.

          Random executions doesn’t transfer political power, adventurism was debunked back when the SRs failed to lead the Russian Revolution. Execution is a tool with its own use, but it isn’t the best tool in all situations.

          • bearboiblake@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            yeah, the USSR and China are not examples of successful revolutions, neither of those countries are communist

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 hours ago

              The former Soviet Union was Socialist, and so is the PRC. They haven’t reached Communism, but they are examples of Socialism if you count Marxism as Socialist. What makes you say they weren’t? Most people would disagree with you, especially Marxists, so I’m not sure what your stance is.

              • bearboiblake@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                3 hours ago

                any marxist who thinks that the USSR or China is an example of a successful revolution is either ignorant, delusional, or worst of all, a tankie.

                they had some early successes but were immediately co-opted. motherfuckers need to learn about permenent revolution.

                now neither country is socialist, both are imperialist and well on their way towards fascism

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 hours ago

                  The vast majority of Marxists globally are either “ignorant, delusional, or worst of all, tankies” then. The idea that the Soviet Union wasn’t Socialist is an extremely fringe opinion among all of Marxists, typically limited to Trotskyists, themselves limited to Western Countries and devoid of any revolutions.

                  Oh, you mentioned Permanent Revolution. I take it you’re a Trotskyist, then? That explains your stance, but I really don’t see why Permanent Revolution is relevant in any way, the theoretical basis relied on the assumption of the Peasantry as incapable of being truly aligned with the Proletariat and thus eventually would become counter-revolutionary. This ended up being false, and Socialism stabilized in the USSR, Cuba, China, Vietnam, Laos, and more, effectively debunking its relevancy.

                  In China, the Trotskyists wished to martyr China by attacking the Kuomintang and the Japanese Imperialists both, rather than allying with the KMT before overthrowing them. Had the Trotskyists had their way, China would remain a colony.

                  Today, the Russian Federation certainly is Capitalist and extremely Nationalist, but the PRC is still Socialist. I wrote a post on some common problems that some people run into when trying to determine Mode of Production. I also made an introductory Marxist-Leninist reading list, if you want to check it out. I think you’d benefit, especially since you took more of an adventurist route.

                  • bearboiblake@pawb.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 hours ago

                    i’m not going to get into a debate about it, because i have better things to do, sorry.

                    i would agree that the USSR was socialist, but very quickly stopped being so, and now it is capitalist. that’s not what i call a success.

          • bearboiblake@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 hours ago

            yeah you’re not a leftist, you have no fucking idea what fascism is if you think what i wrote was fascistic, lmfao

            violence against oppressors isn’t fascism, it’s justice.

            • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Let’s play spot the difference

              I’m going to kill everyone I disagree with because I’m right and put my people in charge of the economy

              -Every fascist

              I’m going to kill everyone I disagree with because I’m right and put my people in charge of the economy

              -you

              • bearboiblake@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                60 minutes ago

                i would completely dismantle the economy, the police force, the military, prisons, and the government. i would cease the recognition of all countries and borders.

                but yes you’re right, i’m willing to use violence to make the world a better place, because i believe that i’m right, and i’m not scared of sacrificing all that i have and all that i am to achieve that.

                i wouldn’t be able to peacefully retire, of course, i would need to be brought to justice for my crimes, but i would gladly accept the punishment, because it’s the right thing to do, and i know i would reduce the suffering of billions.