• Jesus_666@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    13 days ago

    Well, the rice farmers were supporting a dedicated military force with the backing of two major countries and a robust covert logistics network. That kinda changes things a little bit.

    • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 days ago

      You aren’t doing a very good job of countering the thesis that the ‘US lost a war to rice farmers’. Of course they had support, so did the US, and the US lost.

      • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 days ago

        Arms manufacturers won. And they’re still winning. No matter how we frame our thoughts.

      • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 days ago

        The army and the foreign support did a lot of heavy lifting there. Discounting them is like saying that the American Civil War was won by a bunch of escaped cotton pickers. Sure, those escaped cotton pickers fought alongside the armed forces of some twenty-ish American states but they participated so we can attribute victory to them.

        To bring the logic to the extreme, WWII was singlehandedly won by a French tennis player. Sure, his contribution consisted of finding American soldiers to rescue prisoners from the SS during the Battle of Castle Itter but he fought against the Third Reich and we’ll just look past everyone else who did. (If that isn’t absurd enough for you, I also could’ve nominated an SS officer as the war’s winner, also from the same battle. It was a very weird battle.)