brianpeiris@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoNo AI* Here - A Response to Mozilla's Next Chapter - Waterfox Blogwww.waterfox.comexternal-linkmessage-square123linkfedilinkarrow-up1604arrow-down115cross-posted to: privacy@programming.devprivacy@lemmy.mlfirefox@fedia.iofirefox@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
arrow-up1589arrow-down1external-linkNo AI* Here - A Response to Mozilla's Next Chapter - Waterfox Blogwww.waterfox.combrianpeiris@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square123linkfedilinkcross-posted to: privacy@programming.devprivacy@lemmy.mlfirefox@fedia.iofirefox@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
minus-squareonehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·1 month ago All these teams cannot maintain their own browser engine False.
minus-squareAllero@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month agoInteresting, though Goanna is still a Gecko fork.
minus-squarenyan@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agoIt is, but it’s so divergent these days that 90% of Mozilla patches won’t even apply to the codebase (and presumably vice-versa). My conclusion is that Pale Moon and Goanna are capable of surviving if Firefox development ceases.
minus-squareyistdaj@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-228 days agoPale Moon is criticised precisely because its developers don’t have the resources to keep it fast, feature complete and secure.
False.
Interesting, though Goanna is still a Gecko fork.
It is, but it’s so divergent these days that 90% of Mozilla patches won’t even apply to the codebase (and presumably vice-versa). My conclusion is that Pale Moon and Goanna are capable of surviving if Firefox development ceases.
I see
Pale Moon is criticised precisely because its developers don’t have the resources to keep it fast, feature complete and secure.