I mean besides the obvious in ties to a SovCit, the letter itself doesn’t read quite like it should. The language used seems a little too basic for a financial document.
Though I can’t say for certain, as I have exactly zero experience with financing a car through a dealer. Credit unions ftw.
Even if the letter is fake, it still says his account is only considered paid in full “subject to final accounting and receipt of good funds”. Which would not have happened. So the document doesn’t even say that the car “is” paid off. It just says it might be, if the money does indeed arrive.
I think they scanned the real letter and added their own shit. Would explain the horrible grammar and spelling in some sentences while others read at a higher grade level.
I mean besides the obvious in ties to a SovCit, the letter itself doesn’t read quite like it should. The language used seems a little too basic for a financial document.
Though I can’t say for certain, as I have exactly zero experience with financing a car through a dealer. Credit unions ftw.
Even if the letter is fake, it still says his account is only considered paid in full “subject to final accounting and receipt of good funds”. Which would not have happened. So the document doesn’t even say that the car “is” paid off. It just says it might be, if the money does indeed arrive.
I think they scanned the real letter and added their own shit. Would explain the horrible grammar and spelling in some sentences while others read at a higher grade level.
Yeah I doubt Toyota, or anyone, would use terms like “free and clear”.