Some farms that feed cows in yards already use food additives that help reduce methane production in a cow’s stomach, but they have downsides, such as variable efficacy and the need to be constantly supplied, which is difficult if the animals are free to roam.

A vaccine could be an alternative, and the Pirbright Institute in the UK, a virology lab focusing on livestock, is leading a three-year study to develop one. “The appeal of a vaccine as part of the solution is that it’s a very well adopted, common practice, with infrastructure able to do this already, and people know about the benefits of vaccination for animal health generally,” says John Hammond, director of research at The Pirbright Institute.

  • enkers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Yeah, to a certain extent that’s true, but it’s also the demand that creates the subsidies in the first place.

    If all demand were to suddenly disappear (it won’t), you’re absolutely right, production would tend towards lingering on for quite a while. The best option in that sort of case would be for the producers to get paid to not produce. Governments shouldn’t punish people for not being able to forsee every circumstance.

    But that scenario is unrealistic. Transitions take time, and existing systems will have time to respond accordingly.