• Azzu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    There’s a simple reason why reposts will always happen, never stop: different people have seen different things. Your reposts are other people’s never-seen-before content.

  • pseudo@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 days ago

    I am a serial crossposter. And I’ll keep crossposting whether you like it or not. You will not see OC from me, my friend.

    • WbrJr@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Crossposts Form reddit? I though about building a bot that posts the top 3 posts every day to the correspinding lemmy instance, just to get more posts here.

      I Mike lemmy for its very technical posts but sometimes i would like some more shitposts here :D

  • Darkenfolk@dormi.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    I rather have a repost instead of all these motherfuckers only posting a link to some external website which throws a 404 error.

  • davel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    no_nothing demands only original trash for cm002 to regurgitate

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    That’s literally the meaning of meme or memetic; ideas are passed on like a virus. I know it’s annoying to repost memes but that is the circle of memes xD

  • TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    I accept reposts are a part of the fediverse because every instance will have the same damned memes and since I’m federated with quite a few of them, I’m just gonna have to deal with it. Just my take.

    • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      I feel like apps could probably aggregate posts with the same links somehow and allow users to flip between comment threads; but I have no idea how to make that work on the backend.

      • TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’m not much of a dev at all but Id o use AI to help me build app infrastructure. If nothing else, it teaches you how python and react work.

  • Draces@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Then down vote it? Isn’t that the point of that button? I’m assuming a big problem with Reddit was they wanted controversial posts seen which took away from the power of down voting but hopefully Lemmy doesn’t? I don’t actually know though

    • fishos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Ahhh, the rallying cry of “just downvote it”. I’d insert the “this your first time?” gif here if I could. Leaving a community to self moderate invariably turns into a popularity contest, and then when one group eventually takes over, an echo chamber usually filled with the same regurgitated spam. “If you don’t like it just downvote it” or it’s reverse “well it has a lot of upvotes, so someone must like it”(welcome to why we have so many bots today…) always ends up catering to the terminally online at the detriment of the average person. People far too often will speak with absolute confidence about things they have never even experienced, but because it’s well formatted, it’s sent to the top. The Gell-Mann Amnesia effect describes this in part.

      • Draces@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        This site is maybe the worst echo chamber I’ve ever experienced it’s just one that suites my opinions. Hell even if I agree with the echo chamber but I’m the wrong way it gets rejected aggressively. If you think it’s bots then that seems like a more legitimate complaint but if it’s a repost getting enough upvotes and is not weighted for controversy then it’s actually the terminally online people that know every post suffering with their obsession and not the community at large. I completely disagree with that theory

        • fishos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          So when I wrote about bots, I was describing them as an effect created by a cause. You went and reversed the two and are thinking I blamed bots.

          No.

          What I said was that voting based moderation is a popularity contest. An easy way to win popularity contests is to stuff the ballot. On the internet, you can do this with bots. Ergo, the rise in bots all over the Internet is a consequence of our popularity based algorithms and systems. That type of moderation just doesn’t work. But please, keep misunderstanding people and then blaming others. I’m sure that’ll help.

          If you’re gonna disagree with my idea, at least get it right. You’re not being downvotted heavily for not agreeing with the hive mind in the right way. You’re being downvotted for lacking reading comprehension and going off on a crazy sounding tangent.

          • Draces@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            I did not misunderstand your bot theory but good to see you prove my “even if I agree” point lmao

            • fishos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              You ended your comment saying you completely disagree with me after reiterating what I’d just said as if it were your own thought.

              You really need to work on your communication and reading comprehension buddy.

              • Draces@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                If you think it’s bots then that seems like a more legitimate complaint

                An easy way to win popularity contests is to stuff the ballot. On the internet, you can do this with bots

                You really need to work on your communication and reading comprehension buddy.

                Maybe try a mirror bud

                • fishos@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Try reading the whole thing and comprehending it as a complex thought with nuance. I’ll wait. Might take you awhile but I’ll wait.

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    only one message for reposters: if you didn’t make it, don’t post your lazy regurgitated trash

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    Maybe this already exists, but what about a feature which allows tagging a post as a link to a previous/original post, which can be used by clients to filter out reposts if desired.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    There’s stuff I wouldn’t see otherwise because I’m not on other networks. I’m fine with bringing stuff here from elsewhere.