I am not new, i want to say that i as the guy from CIS itself has a tendency to research more, and have russia speaking sources of current communists as Rudoy and Kagarlitsky that clearly suffer from Putin’s regime for example.
Changing one imperalist to another is not an answer and while i get that it is a ww1 situation, i don’t see much of agitation about both sides (Nato, ODKB) losing, more like pure anti NATO narrative without criticism towards what happens to be anti western imperalism (this time it being post-soviet capitalists, exploiting USSRs legacy to the profit of the ones at the top)
You keep using the words regime and imperialism in bad faith which is very common thing from liberals. To avoid rewriting what other comrades have explained, the imperialism accusation against Russia has been discussed before in Lemmygrad:
As for the regime accusation, liberals love accusing non western non aligned countries with that cheap label while ignoring their own countries crimes. From my standpoint, within the ex soviet countries(now capitalist), there are better examples of what a regime does. The worst offender of this is Ukraine governed by the Banderites. From the CIS, we have Uzbekistan or Moldova. Hell, even worse examples of regimes(outside the CIS) are the Keir Starmer regime, the US regime, the German regime and all of the Western countries that banned communist parties and studies. Those offender have even go well beyond to engage in historical revisionism, fascism whitewashing and anti soviet propaganda financed by the Western imperialists.
Once again, it is important to challenge that liberal bias that you currently hold and see the proponents of liberalism, which is the West and their bootlickers, for what they really are.
I am not trying to hypocritically accuse scary-scary russia of being omnipresent bas guy and hence western nazis good, no. What im trying to say is Lemmygrad critically uses RF as a “counter-weight” (as one of answer on first link suggests) or, it is somewhow thinks that Belarus and/or Russia will be a beacon of socialism (not happening) or even worse that they are “everything good, against bad west”
Now, the way you answered my question, from my perspective is you suppose that i am some kind of stupid left-liberal, that does not see the whole picture of current hegemony of the west, and that what i did not like. Now, what i wanted to say is that we, as the communists should be of course using infighting of fascists, capitalists etc to achieve our own goals, however there shouldn’t be any hopes about RF, Belarus or any other entity that is not socialist/communist presenting some kind of “acceptable alternative” that we will bow our head to
I am not new, i want to say that i as the guy from CIS itself has a tendency to research more, and have russia speaking sources of current communists as Rudoy and Kagarlitsky that clearly suffer from Putin’s regime for example.
Changing one imperalist to another is not an answer and while i get that it is a ww1 situation, i don’t see much of agitation about both sides (Nato, ODKB) losing, more like pure anti NATO narrative without criticism towards what happens to be anti western imperalism (this time it being post-soviet capitalists, exploiting USSRs legacy to the profit of the ones at the top)
You keep using the words regime and imperialism in bad faith which is very common thing from liberals. To avoid rewriting what other comrades have explained, the imperialism accusation against Russia has been discussed before in Lemmygrad:
As for the regime accusation, liberals love accusing non western non aligned countries with that cheap label while ignoring their own countries crimes. From my standpoint, within the ex soviet countries(now capitalist), there are better examples of what a regime does. The worst offender of this is Ukraine governed by the Banderites. From the CIS, we have Uzbekistan or Moldova. Hell, even worse examples of regimes(outside the CIS) are the Keir Starmer regime, the US regime, the German regime and all of the Western countries that banned communist parties and studies. Those offender have even go well beyond to engage in historical revisionism, fascism whitewashing and anti soviet propaganda financed by the Western imperialists.
Once again, it is important to challenge that liberal bias that you currently hold and see the proponents of liberalism, which is the West and their bootlickers, for what they really are.
I am not trying to hypocritically accuse scary-scary russia of being omnipresent bas guy and hence western nazis good, no. What im trying to say is Lemmygrad critically uses RF as a “counter-weight” (as one of answer on first link suggests) or, it is somewhow thinks that Belarus and/or Russia will be a beacon of socialism (not happening) or even worse that they are “everything good, against bad west”
Now, the way you answered my question, from my perspective is you suppose that i am some kind of stupid left-liberal, that does not see the whole picture of current hegemony of the west, and that what i did not like. Now, what i wanted to say is that we, as the communists should be of course using infighting of fascists, capitalists etc to achieve our own goals, however there shouldn’t be any hopes about RF, Belarus or any other entity that is not socialist/communist presenting some kind of “acceptable alternative” that we will bow our head to