Mod Visigoth_860@lemmy.cafe posted a really creepy and pro-pedophilia post at https://lemmy.cafe/post/11105990

Mod immediately bans the two people that call it out as trolls.

Update: post is locked after two more bans

    • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
      227·
      2 days ago

      Cute, but not at all what I’m doing. I agree fully with you that this dude is fucked in the head. I’m just sick of seeing other sick behaviour getting a pass. I want to see people keep their own personal ideas about sexuality the fuck away from children.

      Fuck me right?

      • zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.devOP
        201·
        2 days ago

        From you

        wild hypocrites

        From wiki

        Tu quoque (/tjuːˈkwoʊkwiː/;[1] Latin for ‘you also’) is a discussion technique that intends to discredit the opponent’s argument by attacking the opponent’s own personal behavior and actions as being inconsistent with their argument, so that the opponent appears hypocritical.

        You’re doing exactly that. Nobody is talking about whatever else you’re thinking about and it’s irrelevant.

            • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
              53·
              1 day ago

              I’m talking about what ogmios was alluding to without ever coming out and saying. It’s a pretty common tactic with transphobes to equate supporting trans kids with letting children make adult decisions. Their “logic” is “if a fourteen year old can’t decide to fuck an adult they can’t possibly be responsible for knowing their gender doesn’t match what they were assigned at birth.”

              • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                2·
                23 hours ago

                Ah I see it now, the implication they made is disgusting and transphobic, and also is incredibly off-topic since these weren’t issues that were being brought up here, as in their comment was transphobic and off-topic.

        • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
          220·
          2 days ago

          I’m not trying to discredit you though. I’m asking you to extend your reasonable assessment of this situation to other situations which people around here remain wilfully blind too.

            • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
              222·
              2 days ago

              I’m sorry if you can’t see why there’s a connection between this guy arguing for exposing children to sexuality and the exposure of children to sexuality elsewhere, but a reasonable person should be able too.

              • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
                6·
                1 day ago

                Maybe I’m just dumb as fuck but what are you talking about?

                You seem to be referencing a different issue but you never say what the issue is. People are downvoting you a lot so I guess other people know what you’re referring to but I have no idea.

                Why be so vague?

              • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
                72·
                2 days ago

                exposing children to sexuality

                WTF is this supposed to mean?

                Nobody is stopping kids from fucking each other

                • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  5·
                  1 day ago

                  I think maybe they are one of those people who equates transgender hormone treatment and/or sex ed that includes information on homosexuality to sexual abuse, not sure what else this vagueposting would be about

                  • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    2·
                    23 hours ago

                    It would seem they are most likely one of those TERF assholes who are anti-sex-ed and also violently against trans affirming care.