• Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s not. The benefits are all hypothetical. In practical demonstrations, records have dramatically less dynamic range and more distortion. It’s not even a contest.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        CDs have a digital sampling rate of 44.1 KHz. Vinyl is a continuous waveform as an analog medium, but if you were to digitize it, the equivalent sampling rate would be at 96 KHz or higher.

        • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Yeah, but CDs don’t have static, aren’t affected by dust and there’s no hiss. In ideal conditions, vinyl is best, but I don’t live in a vacuum chamber.

          Back in the day my parents had a high quality turntable and sound system from a very well respected manufacturer, and we had strict rules on how you look after vinyl. The first generation CD player blew it away for sound fidelity.

        • Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yes that’s the hypothesis.
          But in practice the distortion eliminates reliable reproduction at those frequencies, which humans can’t hear anyway.