• HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      oh common. do you think thats a legitamate example. it was carved out of maryland and virginia for the specific purpose of being the capital with no state having authority over it.

      • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        But I believe (correct me if I’m wrong, please) that it was also not meant to have a civilian population at all, and only be home to businesses, government offices, and those who were in elected office until they left and returned home. The absence of a civilian population would render the fact that DC has no representation in congress moot. But people started living there, causing the problem of having no representation in Congress.

        • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          yeah and the area is run by the federal government so not having federal representation is basically like not having state representation to boot.

        • futatorius@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          it was also not meant to have a civilian population at all

          Meaning that its population was almost entirely African-American and therefore to be ignored.

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        And the people who live there don’t have representation in Congress, but that’s not the point.

        The point is that it’s not a state. Just “being a possession of the United States” doesn’t confer statehood.

        • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          yes but again its not typical it was a very specific thing. The land had belonged to two different states. the guam, puerto rico, us virgin islands are similar but dc is in on way similar.

          • Nougat@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            Alaska was purchased by the US in 1867. It didn’t get statehood until 1959.

            Being a possession of the United States of America does not automatically make it a state.

            • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              true but its basically a bureaucracy thing at that point. as long as the it has a populace and they seek statehood its going to happen.