• ComradeMiao@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    At my university the police literally threaten anyone who tries to be pro Palestine… every Jewish group is pro zionist

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      The US government is violently supressing free speech where it relates to Israel, and pretending its because of a threat to all Jews. Heres whats in that bill: https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6090/text SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS.

      For purposes of this Act, the term “definition of antisemitism”—

      (1) means the definition of antisemitism adopted on May 26, 2016, by the IHRA, of which the United States is a member, which definition has been adopted by the Department of State; and

      (2) includes the “[c]ontemporary examples of antisemitism” identified in the IHRA definition.

      Whats in the IHRA definition?
      This definition for what antisemitism is:

      • Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
      • Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
      • Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
      • Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.

      It attached itself to the civil rights bill of 1964. So it can take action against anything related to the federal government, like schools, federal contracts, etc, but it does not apply to you and me as private citizens (yet). I can and will say all day that Israel is a genocider, is a violent theocratic racist state, should not have been granted statehodd by the UN, and is as bad as the Nazis.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        99% agree but not sure where “violently” comes in. I would label it more structural oppression or coercion. Still awful, and violence has certainly been invoked under other legislation and government action, but just to be accurate :)