1. Post in !techtakes@awful.systems attacks the entire concept of AI safety as a made-up boogeyman
  2. I disagree and am attacked from all sides for “posting like an evangelist”
  3. I give citations for things I thought would be obvious, such as that AI technology in general has been improving in capability compared to several years ago
  4. Instance ban, “promptfondling evangelist”

This one I’m not aggrieved about as much, it’s just weird. It’s reminiscent of the lemmy.ml type of echo chamber where everyone’s convinced it’s one way, because in a self-fulfilling prophecy, anyone who is not convinced gets yelled at and receives a ban.

Full context: https://ponder.cat/post/1030285 (Some of my replies were after the ban because I didn’t PT Barnum carefully enough, so didn’t realize.)

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    PTB, also major groupthink going on where they want to argue with you about LLMs when your point is explicitly broader.

    • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      I feel like a lot of people, these ones included, have a ready-made idiot in their minds who is saying certain things which they love to dunk on, and the instant someone disagrees with them, they get to work on it with gusto, filling in the other side of the argument with the idiot beliefs so they can save some time and get to snarking.