• neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    6 days ago

    Its pretty fast really. They’re dead the second their body functions stop. Nobody has ever survived being frozen solid. Not really. Coming back from that is a death sentence.

    • Seefra 1@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      The idea is that you put the frozen head in a brain scanner and the synapses are still intact so you can emulate them in a computer or specialised android hardware.

      This way the rich can become imortal gods as the poor can be made to work 24/7 at 10000x efficiency

        • PixxlMan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 days ago

          You don’t know that. Literally, you don’t. Nobody does. This might be your opinion and that’s fine, but stating it as fact is disingenuous

          • p3n@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 days ago

            That depends on their definition of software. If software is partly defined as something we can create, and consciousness is something we can’t even fully understand, let alone create, then they are correct.

          • relic__@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 days ago

            You will never be able to make a perfect copy of the brain and anything less means you wouldn’t be “you” anymore. Any of these schemes about copying the brain are moot because of that, I think.

            • Seefra 1@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              Given advanced enough technology making a perfect scan on the brain seems perfectly duable, you’re not breaking any laws of physic that I know off.

          • masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            You don’t know that.

            I also don’t know whether ghosts exist. Will you go to bat for them, too?

            but stating it as fact is disingenuous

            Pretending that consciousness is software because movies and videogames portrays it working like software is far more disingenuous, I’d say.

        • Seefra 1@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          What I consciousness though?

          It’s clearly not hardware, if either an emulated brain can be conscious or just pretends to do so is impossible to prove or disprove.

          • Akasazh@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            There’s a whole field of philosophy dealing with that question, there’s no consensus yet, though interesting ideas have surfaced

            • Seefra 1@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              I don’t think that’s something that will be solved as it’s not something really tangible.

              The most simple theory and the one I lean towards is that every time you go to deep sleep you effectively die, and when you wake up (or enter REM sleep) you are effectively a whole new consciousness who just happens to have the memories of the many consciousness who previously inhabited your body. This theory is nice because it solves the teleporter paradox, but doesn’t answer the question if an emulated brain actually thinks or just pretends to think. The so called philosophical zombie.

              But also, it’s funny to think that if I truly believed this theory, then I would spend all my money right now and let “whoever inherits my memories” to deal with the consequences.

          • masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            What I consciousness though?

            It’s organic.

            if either an emulated brain can be conscious or just pretends to do so is impossible to prove or disprove.

            The point is moot - the consciousness of the frozen billionaire is non-existent in either case.

              • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                6 days ago

                Going to take it a step further and say artificial life is just organic life with extra steps.

                The concept of robots that continued to evolve post creators is not new to scifi.

                In some ways our own body is simply an emergent complex machine of regenerative biodegradable micro hardware.

              • Soulg@ani.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 days ago

                There maybe could, but it would be a different one from the person. A second consciousness that was copied.

                To my knowledge we are nowhere close to being able to actually transfer a consciousness

                • tomenzgg@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  There maybe could, but it would be a different one from the person. A second consciousness that was copied.

                  The premise behind the videogame SOMA.

                • blarghly@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  Of course we aren’t close. But the above poster was making a categorical statement that consciousness must be biological.

              • masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 days ago

                The only consciousness we have ever encountered is organic in nature - speculation on non-organic forms of consciousness is pretty much esoteric.

                Ie, it depends on your religious beliefs.

                • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  Before airplanes, the only form of flight was organic. This was also a firmly held religious belief.

                  Our ignorance doesn’t mean something isn’t possible. It just means we don’t know if it is possible.

                  • masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    6 days ago

                    Before airplanes, the only form of flight was organic.

                    That doesn’t help your argument at all - flight was being demonstrated long, long before humans even existed to observe it. Can you say the same for non-organic consciousness?

                    I don’t know about you, but I haven’t seen too many scientists rushing to find ways of measuring the consciousness of rocks.

                • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Speculation on organic consciousness is pretty much esoteric, too, given that science can’t even reach a consensus on a definition of “consciousness” yet.

                  For that matter, the scientific boundary between “organic” and “inorganic” is really fuzzy.

                  • masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    Speculation on organic consciousness is pretty much esoteric, too,

                    I don’t disagree. I just don’t see any reason for even an esoteric basis to speculate that consciousness is in any way analogous to computer software simply because “we invented this thing so we must apply it’s logic to ourselves.” It smacks of the “machine” view of how the human body works that became prevalent in medicine after industrialisation - and even today it is still a way of understanding human physiology that causes far more problems than it solves.

                    Ie, there’s no speculative basis for it.

        • Kanda@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          But but software can think now, it’s totally not copying and pasting together random segments it scraped online

      • insomniac_lemon@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        No, ideally the brain itself (at least) can actually be revived and made to be medically stable. Which assumes the preservation process does not cause too much damage.

        (and also it’s vitrification not freezing, though reversing it is still not something that has been done obviously)

        I mean sure, some people are fine with a brain scan (and cryo companies might just say that to temper expectations)… but that sounds like idiot talk to me. I say this as someone who has thought about stuff like this for escapism reasons, not that I have any chance of covering even a reservation fee.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          You can’t vitrify something as large as a human. This is all people watching too much shitty sci-fi being exploited by con artists.

      • Keegen@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        They made an entire game centred around this concept and why it doesn’t work the way they want it to (it’s also a dang good game in general and perfect pick for Spooktober).

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Could you imagine a Star Trek future where some psycho is trying to revive these racist dead fascist!?

        • Seefra 1@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          There’s an episode of TNG where they revive 3 people who were on a cryogenic space capsule.

          One of them was an entitled wall street trader who was completely out of touch with reality and actually thought he was rich because he thought his stock were still there, and that he would try to order Cap. Picard around thinking the Enterprise was some sort of jet company.

          He was constantly dismissed as a rambling old man. Funny episode.