oldie meme but needed to bring this back due to recent incidents 😭

  • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    see i agree with that statement when written out like that. the post doesn’t really do anything to get me to that notion on its own though.

    • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Hm. Maybe it was too subtle? Cunk is explaining why “trolls pretending to be trans” is supposed to be a problem on Lemmy, using her usual brand of accidentally telling it like it is. Lemmy only has a “troll problem” because Lemmy users hate trans people. No trans hate, no troll problem. If everyone respected trans people, nobody would be getting called a troll. If anyone actually tried to troll that way, they’d be met with acceptance and have no power.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        hmmm try workshopping different ways to express this thought, i’m quite lost sorry :(

        • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          All drag’s friends on Discord understood the joke on their first read. Drag isn’t sure where the misunderstanding is. We’re currently in a voice call trying to figure out why anyone doesn’t understand this one. Drag’s friend suggested maybe you don’t think Lemmy is full of transphobes, but drag thinks you do, since you’ve said Lemmy is very misogynistic, and those two things go together. Maybe you didn’t understand that Cunk is supposed to be wrong about the trolls actually existing but right about what the problem the users have is?

          • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            oh okay i get it now. it’s… dense. i usually understand the more complex memes but this one is impenetrable to me. i’m not surprised others had a bad time.

            • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              8 days ago

              Out of curiosity, have you ever watched a Philomena Cunk show? Drag is wondering if that’s part of what makes the difference

                • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  Bizarre. Are you used to seeing versions of the format where Philomena is 100% right? Drag has seen plenty of memes that do that, and drag thinks they misunderstand the format.

                  • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    8 days ago

                    no i know the format well

                    i think the issue is the second panel is asking the audience to infer what the opposite or opposing conclusion the author intends us to come to. and with the text given… it’s not obvious.

                    generally, it’s not rhetorically effective to place the thesis of a work behind a distortion. a lot of the confusion i see in those comments is just struggling to figure out what the authorial intent is because it’s A) not “common knowledge” and B) deeply obfuscated by the Cunk format.