• MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 months ago

      More like 3% and another 2% is for infrastructure. You only need to pretend that that infrastructure is really badly needed for defense, which is rather easy for a lot of it. Like say those are not metro stations, they are bunkers…

    • kbal@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      2% is quite a lot. 5% is madness. I hope that the costs of it start to become apparent to everyone and they reverse course well before they go that far.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 months ago

        Roadways are defence infrastructure.

        Water is defence infrastructure.

        Power is defence infrastructure.

        Resilient rail is definitely defence infrastructure.

        It’s very easy to get that other 3% – and actually get sovereign rail from coast to coast to coast at the same time, which we’d never get if it wasn’t a defence project.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I mean, not in relative terms, and in absolute terms 0.01% is still quite a lot of money but won’t defend anything.