• erusuoyera@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    14 days ago

    There’s no reason RS, when taught well, can’t be secular. In fact, in order to be taught well it really has to be. A good teacher explaining all the world’s religions, their beliefs, and looking at the reasons people believe what they do, should at least encourage agnosticism in the students.

    • Mr Poletski@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      This is exactly what I had at school. They called it 'Core ‘RE’. I learned about hindus, islam, christianity and all sorts of other stuff. It was not a mandatory GCSE though, but you could take an RE GCSE, I did not.

    • Buckshot@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 days ago

      This is exactly what my RS was like, very inclusive and secular and my teacher was an Anglican priest. He didn’t let his own views impact his teaching. I didn’t appreciate it at the time but he was a great teacher.

    • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      Meanwhile in Catholic school, we did an entire year on the Gospel of John. Couldn’t ask for a better way to convert everyone to atheism.

      • erusuoyera@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        I was speaking to my wife about our schooling and saying how much I enjoyed RS. We had a teacher who made a point of plainly, and without bias explaining all the mysterys of human beliefs. It was truly a fascinating subject. Whereas my wife’s RS consisted of a minister coming in and reading the bible. We’re the same age, from the same country.