Welcome again to everybody. Make yourself at home. In the time-honoured tradition of our group, here is the weekly discussion thread.

On Sunday last week, Damascus fell to Salafi terrorists and other imperialist-aligned forces. Regardless of the flaws of the ousted government, this is a horrible situation for the Syrian proletariat as well as for the people of Palestine, Lebanon and others. We can only hope for the perseverance of the Syrian workers and the remaining anti-colonial resistance.

☭ Matrix homeserver and space
 ☭ Theory reading group on hiatus, will move to Lemmygrad next year
☭ Find theory on ProleWiki, marxists.org, Anna’s Archive, libgen

  • ☭ 𝗚𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗘𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗿 ☭@lemmygrad.mlOPM
    8·
    24 days ago

    We wouldn’t fault a person stealing to feed themselves

    I would fault a person repeatedly stealing essential things required for another person to survive

    egalitarian, democratic society that respected minorities and religions

    In what sense are they egalitarian and democratic? A capitalist country, even if it’s relatively decentralized, is neither egalitarian nor democratic in any meaningful sense

    But we can see that conditions can change

    Like I said, it may be worthy of critical support in the future, but certainly not now

    what would have to happen or what kind of conditions would there have to be for you to think that Rojava is a socialist project worth studying

    The first step would be to have a socialist, anti-imperialist government

    • multitotal@lemmygrad.ml
      35·
      24 days ago

      The Kurds of Rojava have a fourth way: to build a “people’s economy”. The 42nd article of the Social Contract says: “The economical system in the provinces shall be directed at providing general welfare and in particular granting funding to science and technology. It shall be aimed at guaranteeing the daily needs of people and to ensure a dignified life. Monopoly is prohibited by law. Labour rights and sustainable development are guaranteed.” [37].

      Dr Ahmad Yousef defines the core of the new economy with the following words: “Historical facts assure us that the economy becomes a science to meet the needs of communities, it isn’t a science to maximise wealth for specific groups. From this definition we must know that the economy would not be economical if it is not social, in other words, any economy that is not aimed at achieving the social welfare of all members of society cannot be defined as economy, but is a sophisticated mechanism for financial, intellectual and cultural looting. This definition of economics is the theoretical basis for the development of economic and social policies in Rojava.” [38].

      He continues: “The market is a main part of social economy, but the use-value must be greater than the exchange-value, and there is no stock market” [39].

      …

      The method in Rojava is not so much against private property, but rather has the goal of putting private property in the service of all the peoples who live in Rojava, for them to use. Naturally we’re only at the beginning. But nonetheless, even if only in small ways, we’re seeing some positive developments. We must be clear that we don’t need an economic revival and development which has no clear goal for the community […] It shouldn’t be a capitalist system, one without respect for the environment; nor should it be a system which continues class contradictions and in the end only serves capital. It should be a participatory model, based on natural resources and a strong infrastructure.

      …

      A people’s economy should thus be based on redistribution and oriented towards needs, rather than on being oriented exclusively towards accumulation and the theft of surplus value and surplus product.

      From a lengthy article (from 2016) analysing the economy of Rojava. written by a Russian Marxist (that’s how he is described, don’t know for certain).

      Sure it’s not full communism, but it’s obvious they don’t want to be capitalist.

      • ☭ 𝗚𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗘𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗿 ☭@lemmygrad.mlOPM
        9·
        24 days ago

        Rhetoric is easy, but in practice, Rojava has no proper state, no vanguard party. Not wanting to be capitalist doesn’t really matter if their economy is de facto capitalist, even if the welfare net is larger than in most capitalist countries or there’s more local democratic participation.

        It feels like I’m repeating myself at this point so I’m going to end it here

        • multitotal@lemmygrad.ml
          22·
          24 days ago

          OK. I will just say that one must examine Rojava as it exists in its current conditions, and not compare it to some ideal.