From the Article:

For weeks following Joe Biden’s disastrous performance, his campaign publicly maintained the illusion that he was still well-positioned to defeat Donald Trump. Privately, they knew otherwise. As Pod Save America co-host Jon Favreau revealed days after the election:

After the debate, the Biden people told us that the polls were fine, and Biden was still the strongest candidate. They were privately telling reporters, at the time, that Kamala Harris couldn’t win. […] Then we find out, when the Biden campaign becomes the Harris campaign, that the Biden campaign’s own internal polling, at the time when they were telling us he was the strongest candidate, showed that Donald Trump was going to win 400 electoral votes.

The implications of this are staggering, and it should be treated as a massive scandal.

  • DeadWorldWalking@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    18 days ago

    You’re allowed to go look at which groups voted differently,

    It shouldn’t be this much of a struggle for you to engage with reality.

    Maybe you need to self reflect on why that is

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 days ago

      So you’re saying just because men voted differently, that means they voted differently because she’s a woman.

      To be honest, that insinuation is actually sexist.

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 days ago

        I’m a white male who voted for Harris in California.

        I know lots of white men and Latino men and Black men who voted for Harris in my state. The other choice was “Deport first, then kill the rest.”

        It’s weirdly sexist/bigoted from liberals to say men instantly hate a woman who runs.