• Malfeasant@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    22 days ago

    Are you able to do this?

    Ahead of time, I could answer truthfully that I am able. I don’t have to say “but when the time comes, I may choose not to for any reason”

    • helloworld55@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      I mean that may be “the truth”, but it is purposely not “the whole truth”. Which is a violation of the oath. The only way jury nullification is allowed is if a jury independently decides not to convict, because then jury is unbiased in deciding that the law is wrong or shouldn’t apply.

      Again, if you are selected for jury duty, and you already have decided you will ignore the law to avoid convicting the criminal, then there is no way you can make it past the selection without lying to the court.

      • lad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 days ago

        I think then talks about jury nullification may be changed in such a way that no legal matter is discussed, but a jury is still inclined to act such that nullification happens, and that will be in accordance to the phrasing of the oath

      • wellheh@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Afaik, in a court of law, the questions they ask matter. If it is a poorly worded question, it is the fault of the one interrogating. Don’t answer your own version of their questions